• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类在丙泊酚镇静/催眠深度增加过程中的自主循环和脑皮质反应。

Autonomic circulatory and cerebrocortical responses during increasing depth of propofol sedation/hypnosis in humans.

作者信息

Lafreniere G, Milne B, Brunet D G, Adams M A, Parlow J L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2000 May;47(5):441-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03018974.

DOI:10.1007/BF03018974
PMID:10831201
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the relative effects of graded central nervous system (CNS) depression, using increasing propofol infusion rates, on neurovegetative brainstem-mediated circulatory control mechanisms and higher cortical activity in healthy humans.

METHODS

Propofol was administered using an infusion scheme designed to achieve three target blood concentrations in ten healthy volunteers. Blood propofol concentrations and sedation scores were determined at baseline, during the three propofol infusion levels, and 30 min into the recovery period. Electroencephalographic (EEG) power was measured in three frequency bands to quantify cortical activity, and autonomic heart rate control was quantified using spontaneous baroreflex assessment and power spectral analysis of pulse interval.

RESULTS

Sedation scores closely paralleled propofol blood concentrations (0, 0.53 +/- 0.34, 1.24 +/- 0.21, 3.11 +/- 0.80, and 0.96 +/- 0.42 microg x mL(-1) at baseline, three infusion levels and recovery respectively), and all subjects were unconscious at the deepest level. Indices of autonomic heart rate control were decreased only at the deepest levels of CNS depression, while EEG effects were apparent at all propofol infusion rates. These EEG effects were frequency specific, with power in the beta band being affected at light levels of sedation, and alpha and delta power altered at deeper levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support a relative preservation of neurovegetative circulatory control mechanisms during the early stages of CNS depression using gradually increasing rates of infusion of propofol. Indices of circulatory control did not reliably reflect depth of sedation.

摘要

目的

描述在健康人体中,使用递增的丙泊酚输注速率导致的分级中枢神经系统(CNS)抑制对神经植物性脑干介导的循环控制机制和高级皮层活动的相对影响。

方法

采用一种输注方案对十名健康志愿者给予丙泊酚,以达到三个目标血药浓度。在基线、三个丙泊酚输注水平期间以及恢复期30分钟时测定血丙泊酚浓度和镇静评分。在三个频段测量脑电图(EEG)功率以量化皮层活动,并使用自发压力反射评估和脉搏间期功率谱分析来量化自主心率控制。

结果

镇静评分与丙泊酚血药浓度密切平行(基线、三个输注水平和恢复期时分别为0、0.53±0.34、1.24±0.21、3.11±0.80和0.96±0.42μg·mL⁻¹),并且所有受试者在最深水平时均无意识。自主心率控制指标仅在CNS抑制的最深水平时降低,而EEG效应在所有丙泊酚输注速率下均明显。这些EEG效应具有频率特异性,在轻度镇静水平时β频段功率受到影响,而在较深水平时α和δ功率发生改变。

结论

本研究结果支持在使用逐渐递增速率输注丙泊酚导致CNS抑制的早期阶段,神经植物性循环控制机制相对保留。循环控制指标不能可靠地反映镇静深度。

相似文献

1
Autonomic circulatory and cerebrocortical responses during increasing depth of propofol sedation/hypnosis in humans.人类在丙泊酚镇静/催眠深度增加过程中的自主循环和脑皮质反应。
Can J Anaesth. 2000 May;47(5):441-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03018974.
2
The different effects of intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation on hemodynamic and heart rate variability.静脉注射丙泊酚和咪达唑仑镇静对血流动力学及心率变异性的不同影响。
Anesth Analg. 2005 Jul;101(1):97-102, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000156204.89879.5C.
3
Topographic electroencephalogram of propofol-induced conscious sedation.丙泊酚诱导清醒镇静的脑电图地形图
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Dec;58(6):666-74. doi: 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90023-3.
4
Comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑对腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉期间心血管自主神经系统影响的比较
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Feb;17(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.03.012.
5
Cardiovascular effects of epinephrine under sedation with nitrous oxide, propofol, or midazolam.一氧化二氮、丙泊酚或咪达唑仑镇静下肾上腺素对心血管系统的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
6
A comparison of propofol and dexmedetomidine for intravenous sedation: a randomized, crossover study of the effects on the central and autonomic nervous systems.丙泊酚和右美托咪定用于静脉镇静的比较:对中枢和自主神经系统影响的随机、交叉研究。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb 1;110(2):415-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c88ba0. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
7
The effect of interruption to propofol sedation on auditory event-related potentials and electroencephalogram in intensive care patients.重症监护患者丙泊酚镇静中断对听觉事件相关电位和脑电图的影响。
Crit Care. 2004 Dec;8(6):R483-90. doi: 10.1186/cc2984. Epub 2004 Oct 22.
8
A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.右美托咪定与丙泊酚对接受磁共振成像检查的儿童的镇静、血流动力学及呼吸效应的比较
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):63-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000219592.82598.AA.
9
Different effects on circulatory control during volatile induction and maintenance of anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia: autonomic nervous activity and arterial cardiac baroreflex function evaluated by blood pressure and heart rate variability analysis.挥发性麻醉诱导与维持及全静脉麻醉期间对循环控制的不同影响:通过血压和心率变异性分析评估自主神经活动和动脉压力感受性反射功能
J Clin Anesth. 2006 Mar;18(2):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.06.004.
10
Infusion of propofol ('Diprivan') as sedative technique for colonoscopies.输注丙泊酚(“得普利麻”)作为结肠镜检查的镇静技术。
Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 Suppl 3:120-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between postsurgical pain and heart rate variability: protocol for a scoping review.术后疼痛与心率变异性之间的关联:一项范围综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 13;11(4):e044949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044949.
2
Beat-by-beat cardiovascular index to predict unexpected intraoperative movement in anesthetized unparalyzed patients: a retrospective analysis.逐搏心血管指数预测未使用肌松药麻醉患者术中意外体动:一项回顾性分析
J Clin Monit Comput. 2007 Apr;21(2):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s10877-006-9061-9. Epub 2006 Dec 22.