Health Policy Plan. 2000 Jun;15(2):130-6. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.2.130.
Research resources for addressing health problems of developing countries remain disproportionately low compared with the tremendous disease burdens borne by these countries. There is a need to focus these scarce resources on research that will optimize health benefits and lead to equity. This paper reviews processes and methods that have been used for setting research priorities. Past and current processes have focused on expert-driven research agenda, emphasizing scientific autonomy and global analyses. Methods for setting priorities have focused on the metrics of disease burdens, while less attention has been placed on who sets priorities and how choices are made. The paper proposes a strategy of priority setting, based on lessons learned from essential national health research (ENHR) approaches attempted in several developing countries. With equity in health and development as its goal, the proposed model is demand-driven, and involves multi-dimensional inputs and multiple stakeholders. Various steps of the process are discussed: getting participants involved; gathering evidence and information; determining criteria for priority setting; and implementation and evaluation. The paper concludes with a discussion of the gap between national research priorities and the research agenda set at regional and global levels, an issue that needs to be satisfactorily addressed in the future.
与发展中国家所承受的巨大疾病负担相比,用于解决这些国家健康问题的研究资源仍然少得不成比例。有必要将这些稀缺资源集中用于能优化健康效益并实现公平的研究。本文回顾了用于确定研究重点的流程和方法。过去和当前的流程都侧重于专家主导的研究议程,强调科学自主性和全球分析。确定重点的方法侧重于疾病负担指标,而对谁来确定重点以及如何做出选择关注较少。本文基于在几个发展中国家尝试的基本国家卫生研究(ENHR)方法所吸取的经验教训,提出了一种确定重点的策略。该提议的模式以健康与发展公平为目标,是需求驱动的,涉及多维度投入和多个利益相关者。文中讨论了该过程的各个步骤:让参与者参与;收集证据和信息;确定确定重点的标准;以及实施和评估。本文最后讨论了国家研究重点与区域和全球层面设定的研究议程之间的差距,这一问题未来需要得到令人满意的解决。