Suppr超能文献

用于图像存档与通信系统的相关先验预取算法性能

Relevant priors prefetching algorithm performance for a picture archiving and communication system.

作者信息

Andriole K P, Avrin D E, Yin L, Gould R G, Luth D M, Arenson R L

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0628, USA.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):73-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03167629.

Abstract

Proper prefetching of relevant prior examinations from a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) archive, when a patient is scheduled for a new imaging study, and sending the historic images to the display station where the new examination is expected to be routed and subsequently read out, can greatly facilitate interpretation and review, as well as enhance radiology departmental workflow and PACS performance. In practice, it has proven extremely difficult to implement an automatic prefetch as successful as the experienced fileroom clerk. An algorithm based on defined metagroup categories for examination type mnemonics has been designed and implemented as one possible solution to the prefetch problem. The metagroups such as gastrointestinal (GI) tract, abdomen, chest, etc, can represent, in a small number of categories, the several hundreds of examination types performed by a typical radiology department. These metagroups can be defined in a table of examination mnemonics that maps a particular mnemonic to a metagroup or groups, and vice versa. This table is used to effect the prefetch rules of relevance. A given examination may relate to several prefetch categories, and preferences are easily configurable for a particular site. The prefetch algorithm metatable was implemented in database structured query language (SQL) using a many-to-many fetch category strategy. Algorithm performance was measured by analyzing the appropriateness of the priors fetched based on the examination type of the current study. Fetched relevant priors, missed relevant priors, fetched priors that were not relevant to the current examination, and priors not fetched that were not relevant were used to calculate sensitivity and specificity for the prefetch method. The time required for real-time requesting of priors not previously prefetched was also measured. The sensitivity of the prefetch algorithm was determined to be 98.3% and the specificity 100%. Time required for on-demand requesting of priors was 9.5 minutes on average, although this time varied based on age of the prior examination and on the time of day and database traffic. A prefetch algorithm based on metatable examination mnemonic categories can pull the most appropriate relevant priors, reduce the number of missed relevant priors, and therefore reduce the time involved for the manual task of on-demand requests of priors. Network and database traffic can be reduced as well by decreasing the number of priors selected from the archive and subsequently transmitted to the display stations, through elimination of transactions on examinations not relevant to the current study.

摘要

当安排患者进行新的影像检查时,从图像存档与通信系统(PACS)存档中正确预取相关的既往检查,并将历史图像发送到预期新检查将被路由并随后读出的显示站,这可以极大地促进解读和复查,同时增强放射科的工作流程和PACS性能。在实践中,事实证明要实现像经验丰富的档案管理员那样成功的自动预取极其困难。一种基于为检查类型助记符定义的元组类别算法已被设计并实施,作为预取问题的一种可能解决方案。诸如胃肠道(GI)、腹部、胸部等元组,可以用少数几个类别来表示典型放射科执行的数百种检查类型。这些元组可以在一个检查助记符表中定义,该表将特定的助记符映射到一个或多个元组,反之亦然。此表用于实现相关性的预取规则。给定的一项检查可能与多个预取类别相关,并且特定站点的偏好很容易配置。预取算法元表使用多对多的获取类别策略通过数据库结构化查询语言(SQL)来实现。通过分析基于当前检查类型预取的既往检查的适当性来衡量算法性能。获取的相关既往检查、遗漏的相关既往检查、获取的与当前检查无关的既往检查以及未获取的不相关既往检查,用于计算预取方法的敏感性和特异性。还测量了实时请求先前未预取的既往检查所需的时间。预取算法的敏感性确定为98.3%,特异性为100%。按需请求既往检查的平均时间为9.5分钟,不过此时间会因既往检查的时长、一天中的时间以及数据库流量而有所不同。基于元表检查助记符类别的预取算法可以提取最合适的相关既往检查,减少遗漏的相关既往检查数量,从而减少按需请求既往检查这一手动任务所涉及的时间。通过消除与当前研究无关的检查的事务处理,从存档中选择并随后传输到显示站的既往检查数量减少,网络和数据库流量也可以降低。

相似文献

1
Relevant priors prefetching algorithm performance for a picture archiving and communication system.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):73-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03167629.
2
An inductive method for automatic generation of referring physician prefetch rules for PACS.
J Digit Imaging. 2002 Dec;15(4):226-31. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-0033-4. Epub 2003 Jan 21.
3
4
Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 Nov;13(4):145-56. doi: 10.1007/BF03168389.
7
Problem-oriented prefetching for an integrated clinical imaging workstation.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):242-53. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080242.
8
Performance and function of a desktop viewer at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):147-52. doi: 10.1007/BF03167648.
10
Hard disk online caches in picture archiving and communication systems archives: how big is beautiful?
Eur Radiol. 2006 Aug;16(8):1847-53. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0137-6. Epub 2006 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Hard disk online caches in picture archiving and communication systems archives: how big is beautiful?
Eur Radiol. 2006 Aug;16(8):1847-53. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0137-6. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
2
[PACS: storage and retrieval of digital radiological image data].
Radiologe. 2005 Aug;45(8):690-7. doi: 10.1007/s00117-005-1231-0.
3
Problem-oriented prefetching for an integrated clinical imaging workstation.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):242-53. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080242.

本文引用的文献

1
PACS databases and enrichment of the folder manager concept.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 Feb;13(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03168334.
3
Software suite for image archiving and retrieval.
Radiographics. 1992 Mar;12(2):357-63. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.12.2.1561425.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验