Physiologic monitoring systems monitor vital physiologic parameters so that clinicians can be informed of changes in a patient's condition. They typically consist of several distinct components, including a central station, bedside monitors, and ambulatory telemetry transmitters and receivers. We previously evaluated physiologic monitoring systems in our January-February 1999 issue (Health Devices 28[1-2]). For this update, we have tested systems from two additional suppliers, using the same criteria and test methods that we used for the eight systems in the original study. As in the earlier Evaluation, we have examined how each system functions as a whole, rather than focusing on the performance of individual components. We judged the systems primarily on adaptability, alarm implementation, and human factors design. In the Conclusions, we compare all 10 units evaluated to date. We also provide updated product information for the systems evaluated in our original study; in some cases, the changes that have been made to those systems have caused us to revise our ratings. We rated all the systems based on their capabilities for each of six applications: (1) critical care unit, (2) emergency department, (3) intermediate care unit and general medical/surgical floor, (4) operating room, (5) postanesthesia care unit, and (6) transport. As in our earlier study, we have determined that most of the evaluated systems have drawbacks for one or more of the evaluated applications. In our January-February 1999 Evaluation of physiologic monitoring systems (Health Devices 28[1-2]), we discussed the issues surrounding the purchase and use of these systems. In this introduction, we recap the most significant points from that discussion, provide some new information about ambulatory telemetry and wireless networks, and briefly describe the components of this Update Evaluation.
生理监测系统可监测重要的生理参数,以便临床医生了解患者病情的变化。它们通常由几个不同的组件组成,包括中央站、床边监测仪以及动态遥测发射机和接收机。我们曾在1999年1月至2月那期(《健康设备》28[1 - 2])中对生理监测系统进行过评估。此次更新,我们又测试了另外两家供应商的系统,采用了与原始研究中评估八个系统时相同的标准和测试方法。与早期评估一样,我们考察的是每个系统的整体功能,而非专注于单个组件的性能。我们主要从适应性、警报实施和人为因素设计方面对这些系统进行评判。在结论部分,我们比较了迄今为止评估的所有10个设备。我们还提供了原始研究中评估的系统的更新产品信息;在某些情况下,这些系统所做的更改使我们不得不修订我们的评级。我们根据所有系统在六种应用中的各自能力进行评级:(1)重症监护病房,(2)急诊科,(3)中级护理病房和普通内科/外科病房,(4)手术室,(5)麻醉后护理病房,以及(6)转运。与我们早期的研究一样,我们已确定大多数评估的系统在一种或多种评估应用中存在缺陷。在我们1999年1月至2月对生理监测系统的评估(《健康设备》28[1 - 2])中,我们讨论了围绕这些系统购买和使用的问题。在本引言中,我们概括了该讨论中的最重要要点,提供了一些关于动态遥测和无线网络的新信息,并简要描述了此次更新评估的组件。