Suppr超能文献

加巴喷丁可增强吗啡对健康志愿者的镇痛效果。

Gabapentin enhances the analgesic effect of morphine in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Eckhardt K, Ammon S, Hofmann U, Riebe A, Gugeler N, Mikus G

机构信息

Dr. Margarete Fischer Bosch Institut fuer Klinische Pharmakologie, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):185-91. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00035.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The most effective group of drugs for the treatment of severe pain is opioid analgesics. Their use, however, is limited by decreased effects in neuropathic and chronic pain as a result of increased pain and development of tolerance. Gabapentin (GBP) is effective in both experimental models of chronic pain and clinical studies of neuropathic pain. Therefore, we investigated, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction of GBP and morphine in 12 healthy male volunteers. Morphine (60 mg, controlled release) or placebo was administered at 8:00 AM, and GBP (600 mg) or placebo was administered at 10:00 AM, thus comparing the analgesic effect of placebo + GBP (600 mg) with placebo + placebo and morphine (60 mg) + GBP in comparison to morphine plus placebo by using the cold pressor test. The duration and intensity of the side effects were assessed by using visual analog scales. The analgesic effect was evaluated by the change in the area under the curve (h x %; 0% baseline before Medication 1) of pain tolerance. Placebo + GBP (18.9% x h, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.5 to 40.3) did not present any significant analgesic effect compared with placebo + placebo (4.7% x h, 95% CI: -16.7 to 26.1). A significant increase in pain tolerance was observed comparing the combination of morphine and GBP (75.5% x h, 95% CI: 54.0-96.9) with morphine + placebo (40.6% x h, 95% CI: 19. 2-62.0). The observed adverse events after placebo + GBP were not significantly different compared with placebo + placebo. Morphine + placebo led to the expected opioid-mediated side effects. They were significantly more pronounced compared with placebo + placebo but did not differ significantly compared with the combination of morphine + GBP. Concerning the pharmacokinetic variables of morphine and its glucuronides, no significant difference between morphine + placebo and morphine + GBP was observed, whereas the area under the curve of GBP (43.9 +/- 5.3 vs 63.4 +/- 16.2 microg. h(-1). mL(-1), P < 0.05) significantly increased, and apparent oral clearance (230.8 +/- 29.4 mL/min vs 178 +/- 97.9 mL/min, P = 0.06) and apparent renal clearance (86.9 +/- 20.6 vs 73.0 +/- 24.2 mL/min, P = 0.067) of GBP decreased when morphine was administered concomitantly. These results suggest two different sites for the pharmacokinetic interaction-one at the level of absorption and the other at the level of elimination. Our study reveals both a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between morphine and GBP, leading to an increased analgesic effect of morphine + GBP. These results and the good tolerability of GBP should favor clinical trials investigating the clinical relevance of the combination of morphine and GBP for treating severe pain.

IMPLICATIONS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial with 12 healthy volunteers, we studied the interaction of morphine and gabapentin using the cold pressor test. The anticonvulsant gabapentin enhanced the acute analgesic effect of morphine. Furthermore, the plasma concentration of gabapentin was increased when morphine was administered concomitantly. Therefore, the well tolerated combination of gabapentin and morphine may improve pain therapy, especially in pain states, like chronic and neuropathic pain, which respond poorly to opioids.

摘要

未标注

治疗重度疼痛最有效的一类药物是阿片类镇痛药。然而,由于疼痛加剧和耐受性的产生,它们在神经性疼痛和慢性疼痛中的效果会降低,从而限制了其应用。加巴喷丁(GBP)在慢性疼痛的实验模型和神经性疼痛的临床研究中均有效。因此,我们在一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究中,调查了12名健康男性志愿者中GBP与吗啡的药效学和药代动力学相互作用。上午8点给予吗啡(60mg,控释)或安慰剂,上午10点给予GBP(600mg)或安慰剂,通过冷加压试验比较安慰剂+GBP(600mg)与安慰剂+安慰剂以及吗啡(60mg)+GBP与吗啡加安慰剂的镇痛效果。使用视觉模拟量表评估副作用的持续时间和强度。通过疼痛耐受性曲线下面积(小时×%;给药1前基线为0%)的变化评估镇痛效果。与安慰剂+安慰剂(4.7%×小时,95%置信区间[CI]:-16.7至26.1)相比,安慰剂+GBP(18.9%×小时,95%CI:-2.5至40.3)未呈现任何显著的镇痛效果。与吗啡+安慰剂(40.6%×小时,95%CI:19.2至62.0)相比,观察到吗啡与GBP联合使用时疼痛耐受性显著增加(75.5%×小时,95%CI:$$)。安慰剂+GBP后观察到的不良事件与安慰剂+安慰剂相比无显著差异。吗啡+安慰剂导致了预期的阿片类药物介导的副作用。与安慰剂+安慰剂相比,这些副作用明显更显著,但与吗啡+GBP联合使用相比无显著差异。关于吗啡及其葡萄糖醛酸苷的药代动力学变量,吗啡+安慰剂与吗啡+GBP之间未观察到显著差异,而GBP的曲线下面积(43.9±5.3对63.4±16.$$,P<0.05)显著增加,同时给予吗啡时GBP的表观口服清除率(230.8±29.4mL/分钟对178±97.9mL/分钟,P = 0.06)和表观肾清除率(86.9±20.6对73.0±24.2mL/分钟,P = 0.067)降低。这些结果提示药代动力学相互作用存在两个不同位点——一个在吸收水平,另一个在消除水平。我们研究揭示了吗啡与GBP之间的药效学和药代动力学相互作用,导致吗啡+GBP的镇痛效果增强。这些结果以及GBP良好的耐受性应有利于开展临床试验,以研究吗啡与GBP联合治疗重度疼痛的临床相关性。

启示

在一项有12名健康志愿者参与的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验中,我们使用冷加压试验研究了吗啡与加巴喷丁的相互作用。抗惊厥药加巴喷丁增强了吗啡的急性镇痛效果。此外,同时给予吗啡时加巴喷丁的血浆浓度升高。因此,加巴喷丁与吗啡耐受性良好的联合使用可能改善疼痛治疗,尤其是在对阿片类药物反应不佳的疼痛状态,如慢性和神经性疼痛中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验