Grimm W, Glaveris C, Hoffmann J, Menz V, Müller H H, Hufnagel G, Maisch B
Department of Cardiology, Hospital of the Philipps-University of Marburg, Germany.
Am Heart J. 2000 Jul;140(1):43-51. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.107178.
To date, considerable controversy exists regarding noninvasive arrhythmia risk stratification in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). Methods and Results Between 1992 and 1997, 202 patients with IDC without a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) underwent echocardiography, signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG), and 24-hour Holter ECG in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs. During 32 +/- 15 months of prospective follow-up, major arrhythmic events, including sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation, or sudden death, occurred in 32 (16%) of 202 patients. After adjusting for baseline medical therapy and antiarrhythmic therapy during follow-up, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified a left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter >/=70 mm and nonsustained VT on Holter as the only independent arrhythmia risk predictors. The combination of an LV end-diastolic diameter >/=70 mm and nonsustained VT was associated with a 14. 3-fold risk for future arrhythmic events (95% confidence interval 2. 3-90). To further elucidate the prognostic value of LV ejection fraction, multivariate Cox analysis was repeated with ejection fraction forced to remain in the model. In the latter model, an ejection fraction </=30% combined with nonsustained VT on Holter was found to be a significant arrhythmia risk predictor with a relative risk of 14.6 (95% confidence interval 2.2-97).
The combination of an LV end-diastolic diameter >/=70 mm and nonsustained VT on Holter, and the combination of LV ejection fraction </=30% and nonsustained VT on Holter, identify a subgroup of patients with IDC with a 14-fold risk for subsequent arrhythmic events. These findings have important implications for the design of future studies evaluating the role of prophylactic defibrillator therapy in patients with IDC.
迄今为止,关于特发性扩张型心肌病(IDC)的非侵入性心律失常风险分层存在相当大的争议。方法与结果1992年至1997年间,202例无持续性室性心动过速(VT)病史的IDC患者在未使用抗心律失常药物的情况下接受了超声心动图、信号平均心电图(ECG)和24小时动态心电图检查。在32±15个月的前瞻性随访期间,202例患者中有32例(16%)发生了主要心律失常事件,包括持续性VT、心室颤动或猝死。在对随访期间的基线药物治疗和抗心律失常治疗进行调整后,多因素Cox回归分析确定左心室(LV)舒张末期直径≥70 mm和动态心电图上的非持续性VT是唯一独立的心律失常风险预测因素。LV舒张末期直径≥70 mm和非持续性VT的组合与未来心律失常事件的风险增加14.3倍相关(95%置信区间2.3 - 90)。为了进一步阐明左心室射血分数的预后价值,在模型中强制纳入射血分数后重复进行多因素Cox分析。在后者的模型中,发现射血分数≤30%与动态心电图上的非持续性VT相结合是一个显著的心律失常风险预测因素,则相对风险为14.6(95%置信区间2.2 - 97)。
LV舒张末期直径≥70 mm和动态心电图上的非持续性VT的组合,以及LV射血分数≤30%和动态心电图上的非持续性VT的组合,确定了一组IDC患者,其随后发生心律失常事件的风险增加14倍。这些发现对未来评估预防性除颤器治疗在IDC患者中作用的研究设计具有重要意义。