Biswas P K, Basu S, Mitra K K, Chowdhury S P, Chatterjee B P, Das Biswas A, Chatterjee S S, Maity A K
Department of Cardiology, SSKM Hospital, Calcutta.
Indian Heart J. 2000 Mar-Apr;52(2):187-91.
Chronic heart failure is associated with excessive neurohormonal activation. Analysis of heart rate variability is considered a valid technique for assessment of the autonomic balance of the heart. Twenty symptomatic patients of dilated cardiomyopathy in NYHA class II-IV symptomatic status and as many normal controls were subjected to 24 hours Holter monitoring to assess the heart rate variability with both time domain and frequency domain analysis. Age of the patients ranged from 12 to 67 years (mean +/- SD 38.6 +/- 7 years), the male-female ratio was 4:1. The left ventricular ejection fraction of the patients was between 18-42 percent (mean +/- SD 30.2 +/- 9%) and all received diuretics, digoxin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Heart rate variability parameters measured included mean heart rate with standard deviation, hourly heart rate with SD and the mean of all normal RR intervals from the 24-hour recording. Time domain measures calculated were SD of all normal RR intervals, SD of 5 minute mean RR intervals and root mean square of difference of successive RR intervals. Using spectral plots, frequency domain subsets of low frequency and high frequency were analysed and expressed in normalised units. Total power was also measured. In the dilated cardiomyopathy patients, mean 24-hour heart rate in beats per minute was significantly higher in comparison to controls (82 +/- 13 vs 72 +/- 8; p < 0.001) whereas mean hourly heart rate with standard deviation (msec) was significantly lower (97 +/- 41 vs 232 +/- 25; p < 0.001), SD of all normal RR intervals (msec) was 85.5 +/- 26.3 vs 139.4 +/- 16.9 in controls (p < 0.001), SD of 5 minute mean RR intervals (msec) was also significantly less in patients in comparison to controls (75.8 +/- 39.6 vs 130.8 +/- 20.3; p < 0.001). However, although root mean square of difference of successive RR intervals (msec) was reduced in patients (30.1 +/- 9.3 vs 37.3 +/- 11.7; p < 0.05), the difference was non-significant. Low frequency power (0.05-0.15 Hz) (normalised units) was reduced in the dilated cardiomyopathy group (0.0721 +/- 0.003 vs 0.136 +/- 0.047 in the control group; p < 0.001). High frequency power (0.35-0.50 Hz) (normalised units) (0.08 +/- 0.05 in patients vs 0.09 +/- 0.02 in controls; p > 0.1) and total power frequency (0.02-0.50 Hz) (normalised units) (0.34 +/- 0.05 in patients vs 0.35 +/- 0.12 in controls; p > 0.1) was non-significantly different in the two groups. Regression analysis showed a significant decrease in SD of all normal RR intervals, SD of 5 minute mean RR intervals, low frequency, high frequency, total power and a non-significant decrease in root mean square of difference of successive RR intervals with a decrease in ejection fraction percent whereas there was a significant decrease in SD of all normal RR intervals, SD of 5 minute mean RR intervals, low frequency and total power and a less significant decrease in root mean square of difference of successive RR intervals and high frequency power with an increase in NYHA class. At 6 months duration, 6 patients were lost to follow-up, 3 patients were readmitted (2 for congestive cardiac failure, one of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia). One patient who was NYHA class IV at baseline was readmitted for congestive cardiac failure and showed much lower heart rate variability parameters compared to the average of the patients. We conclude that in symptomatic dilated cardiomyopathy patients, heart rate variability parameters are significantly reduced in comparison to control subjects.
慢性心力衰竭与神经激素过度激活有关。心率变异性分析被认为是评估心脏自主神经平衡的有效技术。对20例纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能II - IV级有症状的扩张型心肌病患者以及同样数量的正常对照者进行24小时动态心电图监测,采用时域和频域分析来评估心率变异性。患者年龄在12至67岁之间(平均±标准差38.6±7岁),男女比例为4:1。患者的左心室射血分数在18% - 42%之间(平均±标准差30.2±9%),所有患者均接受利尿剂、地高辛和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗。测量的心率变异性参数包括平均心率及其标准差、每小时心率及其标准差以及24小时记录中所有正常RR间期的平均值。计算的时域指标有所有正常RR间期的标准差、5分钟平均RR间期的标准差以及连续RR间期差值的均方根。使用频谱图分析低频和高频的频域子集,并以标准化单位表示。还测量了总功率。在扩张型心肌病患者中,每分钟平均24小时心率明显高于对照组(82±13对72±8;p < 0.001),而每小时平均心率及其标准差(毫秒)明显更低(97±41对232±25;p < 0.001),所有正常RR间期的标准差(毫秒)在患者中为85.5±26.3,对照组为139.4±16.9(p < 0.001),患者5分钟平均RR间期的标准差(毫秒)也明显低于对照组(75.8±39.6对130.8±20.3;p < 0.001)。然而,尽管患者连续RR间期差值的均方根(毫秒)有所降低(30.1±9.3对37.3±11.7;p < 0.05),但差异不显著。扩张型心肌病组低频功率(0.05 - 0.15 Hz)(标准化单位)降低(0.0721±0.003对对照组的0.136±0.047;p < 0.001)。高频功率(0.35 - 0.50 Hz)(标准化单位)(患者为0.08±0.05,对照组为0.09±0.02;p > 0.1)和总功率频率(0.02 - 0.50 Hz)(标准化单位)(患者为0.34±0.05,对照组为0.35±0.12;p > 0.1)在两组间差异不显著。回归分析显示,随着射血分数百分比降低,所有正常RR间期的标准差、5分钟平均RR间期的标准差、低频、高频、总功率均显著降低,连续RR间期差值的均方根降低不显著;而随着NYHA分级增加,所有正常RR间期的标准差、5分钟平均RR间期的标准差、低频和总功率显著降低,连续RR间期差值的均方根和高频功率降低不太显著。在6个月的随访期内,6例患者失访,3例患者再次入院(2例因充血性心力衰竭,1例因阵发性室上性心动过速)。1例基线时为NYHA IV级的患者因充血性心力衰竭再次入院,其心率变异性参数比患者平均水平低得多。我们得出结论,有症状的扩张型心肌病患者与对照受试者相比,心率变异性参数显著降低。