Wuchter C, Leonid K, Ruppert V, Schrappe M, Büchner T, Schoch C, Haferlach T, Harbott J, Ratei R, Dörken B, Ludwig W D
Robert-Rössle-Clinic, Charité Humboldt University of Berlin, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Haematologica. 2000 Jul;85(7):711-21.
A multidrug-resistance (MDR) phenotype mediated by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) contributes to chemotherapy failure in acute leukemia. However, the exact prognostic significance of this resistance mechanism is still unclear, mostly due to methodologic problems in P-gp detection. We therefore investigated, whether P-gp expression levels or functional P-gp activity better predict response to induction chemotherapy, relapse rate and overall survival in acute leukemia.
We examined cell samples of 121 adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 102 children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for P-gp expression and functional P-gp activity by flow cytometry. P-gp function was determined by the rhodamine 123 (rh123)-efflux test (AML n=121, ALL n=102) and P-gp expression levels using the P-gp specific monoclonal antibodies (moabs) MRK-16 (AML n=51, ALL n=31), 4.E3 (AML n=35, ALL n=32), or UIC-2 (AML n=68, ALL n=50). We correlated our findings with the immunophenotype, FAB morphology, cytogenetics and clinical data of the examined patients.
P-gp expression levels as detected by MRK-16 and 4.E3 were very low and did not differ between AML and ALL as estimated using relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) values and D-values by Kolmogorow-Smirnov (KS) statistics. For moab UIC-2, P-gp expression levels were higher in AML than in ALL. Within AML, moab UIC-2 mainly reacted with myelomonocytic-differentiated leukemic cells of the FAB M4/5 subtypes. No correlation between P-gp expression levels as detected by MRK-16, 4.E3 or UIC-2 and the response to induction chemotherapy or relapse rate, both in AML and ALL, was observed. However, a prognostic impact of P-gp expression levels on overall survival in AML was seen for moab MRK-16. Moreover, within AML, P-gp function was higher in immature blast cells as defined by immunophenotype and FAB morphology and correlated with response to induction chemotherapy, relapse rate, overall survival as well as cytogenetic risk groups. In ALL, the overall functional P-gp activity was lower than in AML and did not correlate with immunophenotypical subgroups, response to induction chemotherapy, relapse rate or overall survival.
Our data demonstrate a prognostic impact of P-gp in AML but not ALL and indicate that the functional rh123-efflux assay should be preferred for flow-cytometric P-gp evaluation in acute leukemia compared with P-gp expression analysis by monoclonal antibodies.
由P-糖蛋白(P-gp)介导的多药耐药(MDR)表型导致急性白血病化疗失败。然而,这种耐药机制的确切预后意义仍不清楚,主要是由于P-gp检测存在方法学问题。因此,我们研究了P-gp表达水平或功能性P-gp活性是否能更好地预测急性白血病诱导化疗反应、复发率和总生存期。
我们通过流式细胞术检测了121例成人初发急性髓系白血病(AML)和102例新诊断急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)儿童的细胞样本中的P-gp表达及功能性P-gp活性。通过罗丹明123(rh123)外排试验测定P-gp功能(AML n = 121,ALL n = 102),并使用P-gp特异性单克隆抗体(moabs)MRK-16(AML n = 51,ALL n = 31)、4.E3(AML n = 35,ALL n = 32)或UIC-2(AML n = 68,ALL n = 50)检测P-gp表达水平。我们将研究结果与所检测患者的免疫表型、FAB形态学、细胞遗传学及临床数据进行关联分析。
用MRK-16和4.E3检测的P-gp表达水平非常低,通过Kolmogorow-Smirnov(KS)统计法计算相对荧光强度(RFI)值和D值评估,AML和ALL之间无差异。对于moab UIC-2,AML中的P-gp表达水平高于ALL。在AML中,moab UIC-2主要与FAB M4/5亚型的髓单核细胞分化白血病细胞反应。在AML和ALL中,未观察到MRK-16、4.E3或UIC-2检测的P-gp表达水平与诱导化疗反应或复发率之间存在相关性。然而,对于moab MRK-16,观察到P-gp表达水平对AML总生存期有预后影响。此外,在AML中,根据免疫表型和FAB形态学定义的未成熟原始细胞中P-gp功能较高,且与诱导化疗反应、复发率、总生存期以及细胞遗传学风险组相关。在ALL中,总体功能性P-gp活性低于AML,且与免疫表型亚组、诱导化疗反应、复发率或总生存期无关。
我们的数据表明P-gp对AML有预后影响,但对ALL没有,并表明与通过单克隆抗体进行P-gp表达分析相比,在急性白血病中进行流式细胞术P-gp评估时,功能性rh123外排试验应优先选用。