Shoji N, Mineishi S
First Dept. of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Medical University.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000 Jun;27(6):795-800.
Myeloablation and immunosuppression were considered to be the two major roles of the conditioning regimens for allogeneic stem cell transplantation to facilitate engraftment. It has turned out, however, that immunosuppression is more important and myeloablation is not necessary for engraftment. At the same time, it is considered that the major anti-tumor effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation depends on the graft-versus-leukemia effect, not on the conditioning regimen itself. In patients with CML who relapsed after allogeneic transplantation, for example, infusion of donor lymphocytes can induce a second complete remission. Non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) was developed in the late 90s based on these theories. Low-dose, less toxic, so-called "non-myeloablative" preparative regimens have been designed not to eradicate the malignancies, but to provide sufficient immunosuppression to allow donor cells to engraft, while the graft-versus-malignancy effects eradicate the tumor. This strategy permits allogeneic transplantation to be used in patients who are not eligible for conventional, often myeloablative, transplantation because of advanced age or organ dysfunction. Non-myeloablative preparative regimens contain purine analogs, such as fludarabine or cladribine. The NST regimen being used at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, consists of cladribine (0.11 mg/kg x 6 days), busulfan (4 mg/kg x 2 days) and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (2.5 mg/kg x 4 days). We enrolled 6 patients in this NST protocol so far: 1 with severe aplastic anemia (sibling-PBSCT), 2 with MDS-RA (1 for sibling-PBSCT and 1 for matched uBMT), 1 with AML-CR2 (matched uBMT), 1 with AML-CR3 (sibling-PBSCT), and 1 with relapsed AML (mismatched related PBSCT). All patients achieved engraftment within 14 days with complete donor chimerism. In addition to leukemias, a graft-versus-malignancy effect was also reported in allogeneic NST of solid tumors, such as renal cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma. The long-term efficacy of NST remains to be determined, and further clinical trials are warranted.
清髓和免疫抑制被认为是异基因干细胞移植预处理方案促进植入的两个主要作用。然而,事实证明,免疫抑制更为重要,清髓对于植入并非必需。同时,人们认为异基因干细胞移植的主要抗肿瘤作用取决于移植物抗白血病效应,而非预处理方案本身。例如,在异基因移植后复发的慢性粒细胞白血病患者中,输注供体淋巴细胞可诱导第二次完全缓解。基于这些理论,非清髓性干细胞移植(NST)于90年代后期得以发展。设计了低剂量、毒性较小的所谓“非清髓性”预处理方案,其目的不是根除恶性肿瘤,而是提供足够的免疫抑制以允许供体细胞植入,同时移植物抗恶性肿瘤效应根除肿瘤。这种策略使异基因移植能够用于因年龄较大或器官功能障碍而不符合传统的、通常是清髓性移植条件的患者。非清髓性预处理方案包含嘌呤类似物,如氟达拉滨或克拉屈滨。日本东京国立癌症中心医院使用的NST方案由克拉屈滨(0.11mg/kg×6天)、白消安(4mg/kg×2天)和兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(2.5mg/kg×天)组成。到目前为止,我们已将6例患者纳入该NST方案:1例严重再生障碍性贫血(同胞外周血干细胞移植)、2例骨髓增生异常综合征-难治性贫血(1例同胞外周血干细胞移植,1例匹配无关骨髓移植)、1例急性髓系白血病完全缓解2期(匹配无关骨髓移植)、1例急性髓系白血病完全缓解3期(同胞外周血干细胞移植)、1例复发急性髓系白血病(不匹配相关外周血干细胞移植)。所有患者均在14天内实现植入,且供体完全嵌合。除白血病外,在实体瘤如肾细胞癌和恶性黑色素瘤异体NST中也报道了移植物抗恶性肿瘤效应。NST的长期疗效仍有待确定,有必要进行进一步的临床试验。