Hunter D C, Brustrom J E, Goldsmith B J, Davis L J, Carlos M, Ashley E, Gardner G, Gaal I
Office of the Lead Agent, Travis Air Force Base, California, USA.
Telemed J. 1999 Fall;5(3):273-82. doi: 10.1089/107830299312023.
Two telemedicine networks were developed for the purpose of conducting multidisciplinary oncology ("teleoncology") conferences. The infrastructure of each system differed: one system was Internet-based; the other was delivered via Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) lines. The purpose of this study was to describe the infrastructure and cost, consultative process, technical aspects, and conference format of the two teleoncology programs. The two systems' technical aspects, participant satisfaction with the systems, and conference participation were compared qualitatively. Assessment of the technical aspects of the systems suggested that each had distinct advantages. Survey results indicated that provider satisfaction with the technical and logistical aspects of each type of teleoncology conference was high. The present study may prove helpful for individuals who are considering implementing their own teleoncology programs.
为举办多学科肿瘤学(“远程肿瘤学”)会议,开发了两个远程医疗网络。每个系统的基础设施有所不同:一个系统基于互联网;另一个通过综合业务数字网(ISDN)线路传输。本研究的目的是描述这两个远程肿瘤学项目的基础设施和成本、咨询过程、技术方面以及会议形式。对这两个系统的技术方面、参与者对系统的满意度以及会议参与情况进行了定性比较。对系统技术方面的评估表明,每个系统都有独特的优势。调查结果显示,医疗服务提供者对每种远程肿瘤学会议的技术和后勤方面满意度较高。本研究可能对考虑实施自己的远程肿瘤学项目的个人有所帮助。