Schächter F
CESTI-ISMCM, Université Léonard de Vinci, Paris-la-Défense, France.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Jun;908:64-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06636.x.
The fields of gerontology and genetics have merged, spawning novel lines of investigation and generating a wealth of new results in recent years. However, the lack of clarity and consistency in the basic definitions upon which the science of gerontology must rest has fostered a certain amount of enduring confusion. Among the unclear issues are the genetic components of life span and the distinction between "normal" and "pathologic" aging. At a time of massive world population aging, such issues have, beyond their scientific importance, a momentous social and economic impact. A simple axiomatic framework, consisting of three definitions and five axioms, is proposed that clarifies the aforementioned issues and reconciles disparate data in gerontology. Based on this framework, a new classification of genes involved in survival is proposed. Within the Compensatory Adaptation Theory of aging, apparent paradoxes are solved and problems in gerontology may be formulated anew.
老年学和遗传学领域已经融合,近年来催生出新的研究方向并产生了大量新成果。然而,老年学这门科学所依赖的基本定义缺乏清晰度和一致性,引发了一定程度的长期困惑。其中不明确的问题包括寿命的遗传成分以及“正常”衰老和“病理性”衰老之间的区别。在世界人口大规模老龄化的时代,这些问题除了具有科学重要性之外,还产生了重大的社会和经济影响。本文提出了一个由三个定义和五个公理组成的简单公理框架,该框架澄清了上述问题,并调和了老年学中不同的数据。基于这个框架,提出了一种参与生存的基因的新分类。在衰老的代偿适应理论范围内,明显的悖论得以解决,老年学中的问题也可以重新表述。