Enríquez-Denton M, Nielsen J, Perreault M C, Morita H, Petersen N, Hultborn H
Department of Medical Physiology, The Panum Institute, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
J Physiol. 2000 Aug 1;526 Pt 3(Pt 3):623-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00623.x.
In cat lumbar motoneurones, disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) evoked by stimulation of antagonist motor nerves were depressed for at least 150 ms following conditioning stimulation of flexor (1.7-2 times threshold (T)) and ankle extensor (5T) nerves. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility that this depression is caused by presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms acting at the terminals of group I afferent fibres projecting to the Ia inhibitory interneurones and/or the terminals of these interneurones to the target motoneurones. Conditioning stimulation of flexor, but not ankle extensor, nerves evoked a depression of the monosynaptic Ia excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) recorded intracellularly in Ia inhibitory interneurones. This depression lasted between 200 and 700 ms and was not accompanied by a depression of the monosynaptic EPSPs evoked by stimulation of descending pathways. These results suggest that flexor, but not ankle extensor, group I afferent fibres can modulate sensory transmission at the synapse between Ia afferent fibres and Ia inhibitory interneurones. Conditioning stimulation of flexor muscle nerves, extensor muscle nerves and cutaneous nerves produced a long-lasting increase in excitability of the terminals of the Ia inhibitory interneurones. The increase in the excitability of the terminals was not secondary to an electrotonic spread of synaptic excitation at the soma. Indeed, concomitant with the excitability increase of the terminals there were signs of synaptic inhibition in the soma. The unitary IPSPs induced in target motoneurones following the spike activity of single Ia inhibitory interneurones were depressed by conditioning stimulation of muscle and cutaneous nerves. Since the conditioning stimulation also evoked compound IPSPs in those motoneurones, a firm conclusion as to whether unitary IPSP depression involved presynaptic inhibitory mechanism of the terminals of the interneurones could not be reached. The possibility that the changes in excitability of the Ia interneuronal terminals reflect the presence of a presynaptic inhibitory mechanism similar to that operating at the terminals of the afferent fibres (presynaptic inhibition) is discussed.1. In cat lumbar motoneurones, disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) evoked by stimulation of antagonist motor nerves were depressed for at least 150 ms following conditioning stimulation of flexor (1.7-2 times threshold (T)) and ankle extensor (5T) nerves. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility that this depression is caused by presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms acting at the terminals of group I afferent fibres projecting to the Ia inhibitory interneurones and/or the terminals of these interneurones to the target motoneurones. Conditioning stimulation of flexor, but not ankle extensor, nerves evoked a depression of the monosynaptic Ia excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) recorded intracellularly in Ia inhibitory interneurones. This depression lasted between 200 and 700 ms and was not accompanied by a depression of the monosynaptic EPSPs evoked by stimulation of descending pathways. These results suggest that flexor, but not ankle extensor, group I afferent fibres can modulate sensory transmission at the synapse between Ia afferent fibres and Ia inhibitory interneurones. Conditioning stimulation of flexor muscle nerves, extensor muscle nerves and cutaneous nerves produced a long-lasting increase in excitability of the terminals of the Ia inhibitory interneurones. The increase in the excitability of the terminals was not secondary to an electrotonic spread of synaptic excitation at the soma. Indeed, concomitant with the excitability increase of the terminals there were signs of synaptic inhibition in the soma. The unitary IPSPs induced in target motoneurones following the spike activity of single Ia inhibitory interneurones were depressed by conditioning stimulation
在猫的腰段运动神经元中,刺激拮抗肌运动神经所诱发的双突触抑制性突触后电位(IPSPs),在对屈肌(1.7 - 2倍阈值(T))和踝伸肌(5T)神经进行条件刺激后至少150毫秒内受到抑制。本研究的目的是探讨这种抑制是否由作用于投射到Ia抑制性中间神经元的I类传入纤维终末和/或这些中间神经元至靶运动神经元终末的突触前抑制机制所引起。对屈肌神经而非踝伸肌神经进行条件刺激,可诱发在Ia抑制性中间神经元内细胞记录到的单突触Ia兴奋性突触后电位(EPSPs)受到抑制。这种抑制持续200至700毫秒,且不伴有由下行通路刺激所诱发的单突触EPSPs的抑制。这些结果表明,屈肌而非踝伸肌的I类传入纤维可调节Ia传入纤维与Ia抑制性中间神经元之间突触处的感觉传递。对屈肌神经、伸肌神经和皮肤神经进行条件刺激,可使Ia抑制性中间神经元终末的兴奋性产生持久增加。终末兴奋性的增加并非继发于胞体处突触兴奋的电紧张性扩布。实际上,与终末兴奋性增加同时出现的是胞体处有突触抑制的迹象。单个Ia抑制性中间神经元发放冲动后在靶运动神经元中诱发的单一IPSPs,会因条件刺激而受到抑制。由于条件刺激也在那些运动神经元中诱发复合IPSPs,因此关于单一IPSP抑制是否涉及中间神经元终末的突触前抑制机制,无法得出确凿结论。文中讨论了Ia中间神经元终末兴奋性变化是否反映存在一种与传入纤维终末所起作用类似的突触前抑制机制(突触前抑制)的可能性。1. 在猫的腰段运动神经元中,刺激拮抗肌运动神经所诱发的双突触抑制性突触后电位(IPSPs),在对屈肌(1.7 - 2倍阈值(T))和踝伸肌(5T)神经进行条件刺激后至少150毫秒内受到抑制。本研究的目的是探讨这种抑制是否由作用于投射到Ia抑制性中间神经元的I类传入纤维终末和/或这些中间神经元至靶运动神经元终末的突触前抑制机制所引起。对屈肌神经而非踝伸肌神经进行条件刺激,可诱发在Ia抑制性中间神经元内细胞记录到的单突触Ia兴奋性突触后电位(EPSPs)受到抑制。这种抑制持续200至700毫秒,且不伴有由下行通路刺激所诱发的单突触EPSPs的抑制。这些结果表明,屈肌而非踝伸肌的I类传入纤维可调节Ia传入纤维与Ia抑制性中间神经元之间突触处的感觉传递。对屈肌神经、伸肌神经和皮肤神经进行条件刺激,可使Ia抑制性中间神经元终末的兴奋性产生持久增加。终末兴奋性的增加并非继发于胞体处突触兴奋的电紧张性扩布。实际上,与终末兴奋性增加同时出现的是胞体处有突触抑制的迹象。单个Ia抑制性中间神经元发放冲动后在靶运动神经元中诱发的单一IPSPs,会因条件刺激而受到抑制