Three experiments explored the resistance to simulated reverberation of various cues for selective attention. Listeners decided which of two simultaneous target words belonged to an attended rather than to a simultaneous unattended sentence. Attended and unattended sentences were spatially separated using interaural time differences (ITDs) of 0, +/-45, +/-91 or +/-181 micros. Experiment 1 used sentences resynthesized on a monotone, with sentence pairs having F0 differences of 0, 1, 2, or 4 semitones. Listeners' weak preference for the target word with the same monotonous F0 as the attended sentence was eliminated by reverberation. Experiment 1 also showed that listeners' ability to use ITD differences was seriously impaired by reverberation although some ability remained for the longest ITD tested. In experiment 2 the sentences were spoken with natural prosody, with sentence stress in different places in the attended and unattended sentences. The overall F0 of each sentence was shifted by a constant amount on a log scale to bring the F0 trajectories of the target words either closer together or further apart. These prosodic manipulations were generally more resistant to reverberation than were the ITD differences. In experiment 3, adding a large difference in vocal-tract size (+/- 15%) to the prosodic cues produced a high level of performance which was very resistant to reverberation. The experiments show that the natural prosody and vocal-tract size differences between talkers that were used retain their efficacy in helping selective attention under conditions of reverberation better than do interaural time differences.