Catalona W J, Southwick P C, Slawin K M, Partin A W, Brawer M K, Flanigan R C, Patel A, Richie J P, Walsh P C, Scardino P T, Lange P H, Gasior G H, Loveland K G, Bray K R
Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Urology. 2000 Aug 1;56(2):255-60. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00637-3.
Various methods have been proposed to increase the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), including age-specific PSA reference ranges, PSA density (PSAD), and percent free PSA (%fPSA). In this multicenter study, we compared these methods for their utility in cancer detection and their ability to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized, Stage T1c cancer.
Seven hundred seventy-three men (379 with prostate cancer, 394 with benign prostatic disease), 50 to 75 years old, from seven medical centers were enrolled in this prospective blinded study. All subjects had a palpably benign prostate, PSA 4.0 to 10.0 ng/mL, and a histologically confirmed diagnosis. Hybritech's Tandem PSA and free PSA assays were used.
%fPSA and age-specific PSA cutoffs enhanced PSA specificity for cancer detection, but %fPSA maintained significantly higher sensitivities. Age-specific PSA cutoffs missed 20% to 60% of cancers in men older than 60 years of age. %fPSA and PSAD performed equally well for detection (95% sensitivity) if cutoffs of 25% fPSA or 0.078 PSAD were used. The commonly used PSAD cutoff of 0.15 detected only 59% of cancers. %fPSA and PSAD also produced similar results for prediction of the post-radical prostatectomy pathologic stage. Patients with cancer with higher %fPSA values (greater than 15%) or lower PSAD values (0.15 or less) tended to have less aggressive disease.
The results of this study demonstrated that cancer detection (sensitivity) is significantly higher with %fPSA than with age-specific PSA reference ranges. %fPSA and PSAD provide comparable results, suggesting that %fPSA may be used in place of PSAD for biopsy decisions and in algorithms for prediction of less aggressive tumors since the determination of %fPSA does not require ultrasound.
已提出多种方法来提高前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的特异性,包括年龄特异性PSA参考范围、PSA密度(PSAD)和游离PSA百分比(%fPSA)。在这项多中心研究中,我们比较了这些方法在临床局限性T1c期癌症患者癌症检测中的效用及其预测根治性前列腺切除术后病理分期的能力。
来自七个医疗中心的773名年龄在50至75岁之间的男性(379例前列腺癌患者,394例良性前列腺疾病患者)参与了这项前瞻性盲法研究。所有受试者前列腺触诊为良性,PSA为4.0至10.0 ng/mL,且组织学确诊。使用了Hybritech公司的串联PSA和游离PSA检测方法。
%fPSA和年龄特异性PSA临界值提高了PSA在癌症检测中的特异性,但%fPSA的敏感性显著更高。年龄特异性PSA临界值漏诊了60岁以上男性中20%至60%的癌症。如果使用25% fPSA或0.078 PSAD的临界值,%fPSA和PSAD在检测方面表现同样出色(敏感性为95%)。常用的PSAD临界值0.15仅检测出59%的癌症。%fPSA和PSAD在预测根治性前列腺切除术后病理分期方面也产生了相似的结果。%fPSA值较高(大于15%)或PSAD值较低(0.15或更低)的癌症患者往往疾病侵袭性较小。
本研究结果表明,与年龄特异性PSA参考范围相比,%fPSA在癌症检测(敏感性)方面显著更高。%fPSA和PSAD提供了可比的结果,这表明%fPSA可用于替代PSAD进行活检决策以及在预测侵袭性较小肿瘤的算法中使用,因为%fPSA的测定不需要超声检查。