Lucas D N, Yentis S M, Kinsella S M, Holdcroft A, May A E, Wee M, Robinson P N
Magill Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
J R Soc Med. 2000 Jul;93(7):346-50. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300703.
A new classification for caesarean section was developed in a two-part study conducted at six hospitals. Initially, 90 anaesthetists and obstetricians graded ten clinical scenarios according to five different classification methods--visual analogue scale; suitable anaesthetic technique; maximum time to delivery; clinical definitions; and a 1-5 rating scale. Clinical definitions was the most consistent and useful, and this method was then applied prospectively to 407 caesarean sections at the same six hospitals. There was close agreement (86%) between anaesthetists and obstetricians for the five-point scale (weighted kappa 0.89), increasing to 90% if two categories were combined (weighted kappa 0.91). We suggest that the resultant four-grade classification system--(i) immediate threat to life of woman or fetus; (ii) maternal or fetal compromise which is not immediately life-threatening; (iii) needing early delivery but no maternal or fetal compromise; (iv) at a time to suit the patient and maternity team--should be adopted by multidisciplinary groups with an interest in maternity data collection.
在一项分两部分进行的研究中,六家医院制定了一种新的剖宫产分类方法。该研究首先让90名麻醉师和产科医生根据五种不同的分类方法对十种临床情况进行分级,这五种方法分别是视觉模拟量表、合适的麻醉技术、最长分娩时间、临床定义以及1 - 5级评分量表。临床定义是最一致且最有用的方法,随后该方法被前瞻性地应用于这六家医院的407例剖宫产手术中。麻醉师和产科医生在五点量表上的意见高度一致(86%)(加权kappa系数为0.89),如果将两个类别合并,一致性则提高到90%(加权kappa系数为0.91)。我们建议,多学科团队在收集产妇数据时应采用由此得出的四级分类系统:(i)对产妇或胎儿生命构成直接威胁;(ii)对产妇或胎儿造成影响但不立即危及生命;(iii)需要尽早分娩但未对产妇或胎儿造成影响;(iv)在适合患者和产科团队的时间进行分娩。