Suppr超能文献

N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂、NMDA甘氨酸位点拮抗剂和α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)受体拮抗剂在脊髓介导镇痛中的相互作用。

Interaction among NMDA receptor-, NMDA glycine site- and AMPA receptor antagonists in spinally mediated analgesia.

作者信息

Nishiyama T

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2000 Jul;47(7):693-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03019004.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor antagonists and the NMDA glycine site antagonists given alone have minimal effects on acute nociception. In contrast, the AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid) receptor antagonists have a major role in acute nociception. We investigated the interactions among these three antagonists in acute nociception.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) were implanted with chronic lumbar intrathecal catheters and were tested for their thermal withdrawal response using the hot plate test after intrathecal administration of AP-5 (NMDA receptor antagonist), ACEA 1021 (NMDA glycine site antagonist), or ACEA 2085 (AMPA receptor antagonist). The combinations of these three agents were also tested.

RESULTS

Intrathecal administration of ACEA 2085 had a dose dependent analgesic effect while intrathecal AP-5 or ACEA 1021 could not induce dose dependent effect. Co-administration of AP-5 10 microg and ACEA 2085 intrathecally showed no changes in the thermal response latency compared with ACEA 2085 alone. ACEA 1021, 12 microg, and AP-5 showed left-ward shift of the dose effect curve only with small doses of AP-5 (1 microg, 3 microg). Only the smallest dose of ACEA 2085 (0.1 ng) with ACEA 1021 12 microg induced antinociception compared with that of ACEA 2085 alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the NMDA glycine site antagonist and low doses of the NMDA receptor antagonist or the AMPA receptor antagonist increased the analgesic effect on acute thermal nociception with increased side effects, while the NMDA receptor antagonist and the AMPA receptor antagonist had no such interaction.

摘要

目的

单独给予N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂和NMDA甘氨酸位点拮抗剂对急性伤害感受的影响极小。相比之下,α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基异恶唑-4-丙酸(AMPA)受体拮抗剂在急性伤害感受中起主要作用。我们研究了这三种拮抗剂在急性伤害感受中的相互作用。

方法

将体重250 - 300克的Sprague-Dawley大鼠植入慢性腰段鞘内导管,在鞘内注射AP-5(NMDA受体拮抗剂)、ACEA 1021(NMDA甘氨酸位点拮抗剂)或ACEA 2085(AMPA受体拮抗剂)后,使用热板试验测试其热退缩反应。还对这三种药物的组合进行了测试。

结果

鞘内注射ACEA 2085具有剂量依赖性镇痛作用,而鞘内注射AP-5或ACEA 1021则不能诱导剂量依赖性效应。与单独使用ACEA 2085相比,鞘内联合注射10微克AP-5和ACEA 2085时,热反应潜伏期无变化。仅在小剂量AP-5(1微克、3微克)时,12微克ACEA 1021和AP-5的剂量效应曲线向左移动。与单独使用ACEA 2085相比,仅最小剂量的ACEA 2085(0.1纳克)与12微克ACEA 1021联合使用时可诱导镇痛作用。

结论

NMDA甘氨酸位点拮抗剂与低剂量的NMDA受体拮抗剂或AMPA受体拮抗剂联合使用可增强对急性热伤害感受的镇痛作用,但副作用增加,而NMDA受体拮抗剂和AMPA受体拮抗剂之间不存在这种相互作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验