Kane N M, Wubbenhorst W H
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Milbank Q. 2000;78(2):185-212, 150. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00168.
The tax exemption accorded private, nonprofit hospitals is being subjected to more scrutiny as the numbers of uninsured grow; meanwhile, charity care competes with market-driven priorities. Current public policies tie hospital tax exemption to the provision of charity care, but there is a gap in the size and distribution of values between tax exemption and the charity care that is provided. Most hospitals, in a study reported here, provided free care at a level below the value of their tax exemption, even when 50 percent of bad debt was included in the care value. However, hospitals in the poorest communities offered considerably more care than the value of their tax exemption, whereas those in wealthier communities offered considerably less. Policies at local, state, and federal levels should be designed to exert leverage on hospitals to provide free care at a level commensurate with the value of their tax exemptions.
随着未参保人数的增加,私立非营利性医院享有的免税待遇正受到更多审查;与此同时,慈善医疗与市场驱动的优先事项存在竞争。当前的公共政策将医院免税与提供慈善医疗联系起来,但免税价值与所提供的慈善医疗在规模和分配上存在差距。在此报道的一项研究中,大多数医院提供的免费医疗水平低于其免税价值,即使将50%的坏账计入医疗价值也是如此。然而,最贫困社区的医院提供的医疗服务比其免税价值要多得多,而富裕社区的医院提供的则要少得多。地方、州和联邦各级的政策应旨在对医院施加影响,使其提供与免税价值相当水平的免费医疗服务。