Suppr超能文献

重新评估急性心肌梗死溶栓再通后立即干预的作用。

Reappraising the role of immediate intervention following thrombolytic recanalization in acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Grech E D, Sutton A G, Campbell P G, Ashton V J, Price D J, Hall J A, de Belder M A

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Division, South Cleveland Hospital, Cleveland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2000 Aug 15;86(4):400-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00954-1.

Abstract

Early studies indicated that after successful thrombolytic recanalization, adjunctive percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was not appropriate, even when a significant residual stenosis was present. The aim of this study was to assess in-hospital clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent successful recanalization after thrombolytic therapy. The relation between repeat AMI/unstable angina and the severity of the stenosis, as well as other angiographic and clinical features was also examined. One hundred patients with AMI of <10 hours underwent coronary angiography 2 hours after receiving thrombolytic therapy. Salvage PTCA +/- stenting was performed if recanalization was unsuccessful (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] trial grade 0 to 2), and no PTCA was undertaken if there was brisk anterograde flow (TIMI 3). Angiographic analysis was performed to assess the severity of the residual lesion, as well as the presence or absence of thrombus. Forty patients had unsuccessful recanalization, and of these, 36 underwent attempted PTCA. Of the 60 patients with TIMI 3 flow, 15 required repeat angiography and PTCA after repeat AMI (n = 13) or unstable angina (n = 2) within 5 days. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis indicated an optimum percent diameter stenosis predictor of 85% for repeat AMI/unstable angina. There was no additional relation to age, gender, time to thrombolysis, the infarct-related artery, or the presence of culprit lesion thrombus. After recanalization, a high-grade stenosis >85% is common (n = 25, 42.4%). This is associated with a 54% repeat AMI/unstable angina risk-a ninefold increase in the incidence of such events than in patients with lesions <85%. Thus, patients with narrowings >85% may benefit from early intervention rather than a conservative approach. Narrowings <85% have a 94% probability of no repeat AMI/unstable angina and do not require early intervention.

摘要

早期研究表明,在成功进行溶栓再通后,即使存在明显的残余狭窄,辅助性经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)也并不适宜。本研究的目的是评估接受溶栓治疗后成功再通的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的院内临床结局。同时还研究了复发性AMI/不稳定型心绞痛与狭窄严重程度以及其他血管造影和临床特征之间的关系。100例发病时间小于10小时的AMI患者在接受溶栓治疗2小时后进行冠状动脉造影。如果再通不成功(心肌梗死溶栓治疗[TIMI]试验分级为0至2级),则进行补救性PTCA并酌情置入支架;如果有快速的顺行血流(TIMI 3级),则不进行PTCA。进行血管造影分析以评估残余病变的严重程度以及血栓的有无。40例患者再通不成功,其中36例尝试进行PTCA。在60例TIMI 3级血流的患者中,有15例在5天内发生复发性AMI(n = 13)或不稳定型心绞痛(n = 2)后需要再次进行血管造影和PTCA。受试者工作特征分析表明,复发性AMI/不稳定型心绞痛的最佳直径狭窄百分比预测值为85%。与年龄、性别、溶栓时间、梗死相关动脉或罪犯病变血栓的存在无关。再通后,>85%的高度狭窄很常见(n = 25,42.4%)。这与54%的复发性AMI/不稳定型心绞痛风险相关——此类事件的发生率比病变<85%的患者增加了9倍。因此,狭窄>85%的患者可能从早期干预而非保守治疗中获益。狭窄<85%的患者发生复发性AMI/不稳定型心绞痛的概率为94%,不需要早期干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验