Garber B G, Mmath B P, Fairfull-Smith R J, Yelle J D
Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ont.
Can J Surg. 2000 Aug;43(4):283-8.
To determine the population-based incidence of splenic injuries in the Province of Ontario, the proportion of splenic injuries treated by observation, splenectomy and splenorrhaphy, changes in management over time and the variation in management of splenic injuries among Ontario hospitals.
A retrospective cohort study.
All adults (older than 16 years) admitted with a diagnosis of splenic injury (clinical modification of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision) to acute care hospitals in Ontario between 1991 and 1994, identified from the Ontario Trauma Registry.
The incidence of splenic injury was 1.7 cases per 1000 trauma admissions per year. Patients with splenic injury were young (median age 32 years) and male (71%), and the death rate was 8%. Observation was the commonest method of treatment (69%), followed by splenectomy (28%) and splenorrhaphy (4%). The use of observation increased over the study period from 59% to 75% (p < 0.001). There was significant variation in the use of observation among hospitals (range 11% to 100%, p < 0.0001).
The majority of splenic injuries are managed by observation with an acceptable hospital death rate. The use of observation has increased over time, confirming the growing adoption of this management approach by most hospitals in the province when feasible. Splenorrhaphy was infrequently performed despite reports to the contrary from many centres in the United States. There was significant variation in splenic injury management, suggesting the need for further refinement and dissemination of practical guidelines for splenic salvage.
确定安大略省基于人群的脾损伤发病率、通过观察、脾切除术和脾修补术治疗的脾损伤比例、随时间推移管理方式的变化以及安大略省各医院脾损伤管理的差异。
一项回顾性队列研究。
1991年至1994年间,安大略省急性护理医院收治的所有诊断为脾损伤(国际疾病分类第九版临床修订版)的成年人(16岁以上),通过安大略创伤登记处识别。
脾损伤的发病率为每年每1000例创伤入院患者中有1.7例。脾损伤患者较为年轻(中位年龄32岁),男性居多(71%),死亡率为8%。观察是最常见的治疗方法(69%),其次是脾切除术(28%)和脾修补术(4%)。在研究期间,观察的使用从59%增加到75%(p<0.001)。各医院观察的使用存在显著差异(范围为11%至100%,p<0.0001)。
大多数脾损伤通过观察进行管理,医院死亡率可接受。随着时间的推移,观察的使用有所增加,这证实了该省大多数医院在可行时越来越多地采用这种管理方法。尽管美国许多中心有相反的报道,但脾修补术很少进行。脾损伤管理存在显著差异,表明需要进一步完善和传播脾挽救实用指南。