De Sanctis M T, Belcaro G, Nicolaides A N, Cesarone M R, Incandela L, Marlinghaus E, Griffin M, Capodanno S, Ciccarelli R
Cardiovascular Research, San Valentino, Pescara, Italy.
Angiology. 2000 Aug;51(8 Pt 2):S69-78. doi: 10.1177/000331970005100809.
Shock waves (SWs) are used to control and decrease pain in several clinical conditions (e.g., painful elbow and shoulder, etc). This clinical effect may be due to cellular stunning of the tissues (particularly nervous components) in the area treated with SW. It may also be the consequence of unknown metabolic actions on tissues, which may include changes in cellular permeability and the liberation of proteins and mediators locally acting on pain and nerve endings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reduction in pain and the microcirculation improvement induced by SWs treatment in an 8-week study in patients with chronic limb ischemia (CLI). Patients with CLI (15 with rest pain only and 15 with rest pain and limited distal necrosis) were included. The treatment was based on a 30-minute SWs session, three times weekly for 2 weeks. Clinical and microcirculatory evaluation were performed with laser Doppler Po2 and Pco2 measurements. Pain was measured with an analogue scale line. A Minilith SL1 (Storz Medical, Switzerland) litotriptor was used. The parabolic reflector is coupled to the skin with a silicon water cushion. Focal pressure was adjusted between 6 and 70 Mpa in eight steps. The energy flux density was variable from 0.03 to 0.5 mJ/mm2. Focal diameter and distance were defined (depth of target within the patient's foot of about 70 mm). The coded intensity used in this study was between 6 and 8 and the application time was 20 min (at four impulses per second). Twenty-eight of the 30 patients with CLI (15 with rest pain only and 13 with necrosis) completed the study. The treatment was well tolerated. Blood pressure was unchanged after 8 weeks while the increase in laser Doppler flux was significant (p<0.05) (at all measurements after treatment). The ORACLE score at 1 and 8 weeks was decreased (p<0.05). The same trend was observed with the analogue scale line for pain (p<0.05). PO2 increased (p<0.05) and Pco2 decreased (p<0.05). Tibial pressure did not change. All patients observed an increase in their subjective pain-free walking distance. The improvement was still present after 8 weeks. In a separate subset of 37 patients (mean age 60+/-9 years; males) with CLI, a SWs dose-finding evaluation was performed. Flux changes were measured at the dorsum of the foot. Three treatment plans were used: (a) 20-minute SW treatment only once; (b) 20-minute SWs treatment every 2 days for 1 week; (c) 20 minutes every day for 1 week. Treatments were well tolerated. A different increase in flux was observed on the basis of different treatments. Flux variations generally indicated that increased SWs dosage was associated with proportional flux increase. Flux improvement was still present after 4 weeks. SWs treatment in CLI produced changes both in the microcirculation and on pain. These preliminary results are comforting and open new research options to be explored in the near future.
冲击波(SWs)被用于控制和减轻多种临床病症(如肘部和肩部疼痛等)的疼痛。这种临床效果可能是由于冲击波治疗区域的组织(特别是神经成分)发生细胞休克。这也可能是对组织产生未知代谢作用的结果,这可能包括细胞通透性的改变以及局部作用于疼痛和神经末梢的蛋白质和介质的释放。本研究的目的是在一项为期8周的针对慢性肢体缺血(CLI)患者的研究中,评估冲击波治疗引起的疼痛减轻和微循环改善情况。纳入了CLI患者(15例仅有静息痛,15例有静息痛且远端坏死受限)。治疗基于每次30分钟的冲击波治疗,每周三次,共2周。通过激光多普勒测量氧分压(Po2)和二氧化碳分压(Pco2)进行临床和微循环评估。使用模拟量表线测量疼痛。使用了Minilith SL1(瑞士史托斯医疗公司)碎石机。抛物面反射器通过硅水垫与皮肤耦合。焦点压力分八个步骤在6至70兆帕之间调节。能量通量密度在0.03至0.5毫焦/平方毫米之间变化。确定了焦点直径和距离(患者足部目标深度约70毫米)。本研究中使用的编码强度在6至8之间,施加时间为20分钟(每秒四个脉冲)。30例CLI患者中的28例(15例仅有静息痛,13例有坏死)完成了研究。治疗耐受性良好。8周后血压未改变,而激光多普勒通量增加显著(p<0.05)(治疗后的所有测量值)。1周和8周时的ORACLE评分降低(p<0.05)。疼痛模拟量表线也观察到相同趋势(p<0.05)。氧分压升高(p<0.05),二氧化碳分压降低(p<0.05)。胫压未改变。所有患者的主观无痛步行距离均增加。8周后改善情况仍然存在。在另一组37例CLI患者(平均年龄60±9岁;男性)的子集中,进行了冲击波剂量探索评估。在足背测量通量变化。使用了三种治疗方案:(a)仅进行一次20分钟的冲击波治疗;(b)每2天进行20分钟的冲击波治疗,共1周;(c)每天进行20分钟,共1周。治疗耐受性良好。根据不同治疗观察到通量有不同程度的增加。通量变化总体表明,冲击波剂量增加与通量成比例增加相关。4周后通量改善情况仍然存在。CLI患者的冲击波治疗在微循环和疼痛方面均产生了变化。这些初步结果令人欣慰,并为在不久的将来探索新的研究方向打开了大门。