Suppr超能文献

成人钝性脾损伤:东部创伤外科学会多机构研究

Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional Study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

作者信息

Peitzman A B, Heil B, Rivera L, Federle M B, Harbrecht B G, Clancy K D, Croce M, Enderson B L, Morris J A, Shatz D, Meredith J W, Ochoa J B, Fakhry S M, Cushman J G, Minei J P, McCarthy M, Luchette F A, Townsend R, Tinkoff G, Block E F, Ross S, Frykberg E R, Bell R M, Davis F, Weireter L, Shapiro M B

机构信息

The Multi-Institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2000 Aug;49(2):177-87; discussion 187-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200008000-00002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen in adults has been applied with increasing frequency. However, the criteria for nonoperative management are controversial. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to determine which factors predict successful observation of blunt splenic injury in adults.

METHODS

A total of 1,488 adults (>15 years of age) with blunt splenic injury from 27 trauma centers in 1997 were studied through the Multi-institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and extended chi2 test. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD; a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 38.5 % of patients went directly to the operating room (group I); 61.5% of patients were admitted with planned nonoperative management. Of the patients admitted with planned observation, 10.8% failed and required laparotomy; 82.1% of patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) < 15 and 46.6% of patients with ISS > 15 were successfully observed. Frequency of immediate operation correlated with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades of splenic injury: I (23.9%), II (22.4%), III (38.1%), IV (73.7%), and V (94.9%) (p < 0.05). Of patients initially managed nonoperatively, the failure rate increased significantly by AAST grade of splenic injury: I (4.8%), II (9.5%), III (19.6%), IV (33.3%), and V (75.0%) (p < 0.05). A total of 60.9% of the patients failed nonoperative management within 24 hours of admission; 8% failed 9 days or later after injury. Laparotomy was ultimately performed in 19.9% of patients with small hemoperitoneum, 49.4% of patients with moderate hemoperitoneum, and 72.6% of patients with large hemoperitoneum.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter study, 38.5% of adults with blunt splenic injury went directly to laparotomy. Ultimately, 54.8% of patients were successfully managed nonoperatively; the failure rate of planned observation was 10.8%, with 60.9% of failures occurring in the first 24 hours. Successful nonoperative management was associated with higher blood pressure and hematocrit, and less severe injury based on ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, grade of splenic injury, and quantity of hemoperitoneum.

摘要

背景

成人钝性脾损伤的非手术治疗应用频率日益增加。然而,非手术治疗的标准存在争议。这项多机构研究的目的是确定哪些因素可预测成人钝性脾损伤非手术观察的成功。

方法

1997年,通过东部创伤外科学会多机构试验委员会对来自27个创伤中心的1488例成人(年龄>15岁)钝性脾损伤患者进行了研究。采用方差分析和扩展卡方检验进行统计分析。数据以均值±标准差表示;p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共有38.5%的患者直接进入手术室(I组);61.5%的患者入院时计划进行非手术治疗。在计划进行观察的患者中,10.8%治疗失败,需要进行剖腹手术;损伤严重度评分(ISS)<15的患者中有82.1%、ISS>15的患者中有46.6%非手术观察成功。急诊手术的频率与美国创伤外科学会(AAST)脾损伤分级相关:I级(23.9%)、II级(22.4%)、III级(38.1%)、IV级(73.7%)和V级(94.9%)(p<0.05)。在最初接受非手术治疗的患者中,根据AAST脾损伤分级,失败率显著增加:I级(4.8%)、II级(9.5%)、III级(19.6%)、IV级(33.3%)和V级(75.0%)(p<0.05)。共有60.9%的患者在入院后24小时内非手术治疗失败;8%的患者在受伤9天或更晚后失败。最终,小量腹腔积血患者中有19.9%进行了剖腹手术,中等量腹腔积血患者中有49.4%进行了剖腹手术,大量腹腔积血患者中有72.6%进行了剖腹手术。

结论

在这项多中心研究中,38.5%的成人钝性脾损伤患者直接接受了剖腹手术。最终,54.8%的患者非手术治疗成功;计划观察的失败率为10.8%,其中60.9%的失败发生在最初24小时内。非手术治疗成功与较高的血压和血细胞比容相关,且基于ISS、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、脾损伤分级和腹腔积血量,损伤程度较轻。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验