Sen S S, Thomas J
School of Pharmacy and Pharmacal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1335, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000 Sep 1;57(17):1592-8. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/57.17.1592.
The Purdue Pharmacist Directive Guidance scale (PPDG), which is designed to measure patients' perceptions of the level of directive guidance received from pharmacists, was studied. Hypertension patients were interviewed by telephone between July 15 and August 15, 1998, with a survey including the PPDG, the Medication Adherence Scale (MAS), and the Friends and Family Support scale (FFS). The Behavioral Pharmaceutical Care Scale (BPCS) was mailed between May 15 and July 15, 1998, to pharmacies from which the patients obtained most of their prescriptions. The MAS measures patients' medication adherence, and the FFS measures their perceptions of the social support they receive from family and friends. Analysis of variance was used to assess whether there was significant variation in scale scores across pharmacies. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess simple correlation among scales, and regression analysis was used to examine the association between scale scores while controlling for demographic variables, family support, and number of prescription drugs taken. Interviews with 163 patients were analyzed, and 64 pharmacists representing 32 pharmacies responded. The PPDG did not detect any difference across pharmacies in patients' perceptions of the level of directive guidance received. There was no significant correlation between PPDG scores and pharmacists' perceptions of the level of pharmaceutical care provided as measured with the BPCS or between PPDG scores and MAS scores. The findings reconfirmed the PPDG's reliability and factor structure and provided some evidence of convergent validity. The PPDG was reliable. Evidence of validity was not conclusive, although the high threshold for validity may have been responsible for this.
本研究采用了普渡药剂师指导量表(PPDG),该量表旨在衡量患者对从药剂师处获得的指导水平的认知。1998年7月15日至8月15日期间,通过电话对高血压患者进行了访谈,调查内容包括PPDG、药物依从性量表(MAS)和亲友支持量表(FFS)。1998年5月15日至7月15日期间,向患者获取大部分处方的药房邮寄了行为药学照护量表(BPCS)。MAS衡量患者的药物依从性,FFS衡量患者对从家人和朋友那里获得的社会支持的认知。方差分析用于评估各药房量表得分是否存在显著差异。Pearson相关分析用于评估量表之间的简单相关性,回归分析用于在控制人口统计学变量、家庭支持和所服用处方药数量的同时,检验量表得分之间的关联。对163名患者的访谈进行了分析,来自32家药房的64名药剂师进行了回复。PPDG未发现各药房在患者对所获得指导水平的认知上存在任何差异。PPDG得分与药剂师对用BPCS衡量的药学照护水平的认知之间,或PPDG得分与MAS得分之间均无显著相关性。研究结果再次证实了PPDG的可靠性和因子结构,并提供了一些收敛效度的证据。PPDG是可靠的。有效性的证据并不确凿,尽管有效性的高门槛可能是造成这种情况的原因。