Ferrús L, Honrado G, Pescador M T
L'Hospital de la Creu Roja.
Gac Sanit. 2000 May-Jun;14(3):210-7. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(00)71461-0.
To determine the proportion of inappropriate hospital stays, their typology and the level of nursing care in Diagnosis Related Groups(DRG). To evaluate the use of the PRN (Project Research in Nursing) register forms, when determining AEP (Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol).
A cross-sectional study was performed on 494 patients classified with one of the 10 more frequent DRG in the hospital from February to July 1997. Information from patient clinical histories, PRN register forms, sociodemographic data, and nursing care activities were used. The appropriateness of hospital stay to AEP was assessed on the day prior to discharge. Comparison of inappropriate stays with appropriate stays was performed by chi-square test for categorical variables and Student t-test for continuous variables. The independent associated factors with inappropriateness of hospital stay, were estimated using a log regression model.
Out of 417 valid cases, hospital stay was considered appropriate in 269 (64.5%) patients and inappropriate in 148 (35.5%) patients. Mean-age of inappropriate stays was significantly higher than that of appropriate stays (70.06 +/- 13.84 vs 61.57 +/- 15.07, p < 0.05). Care intensity for inappropriate stays was larger than that of appropriate stays (median 137 [minimal value 45, maximal value 355] vs median 95 [minimal value 35, maximal value 131] p < 0.001). Care time in mobilization, elimination and hygiene activities was longer in inappropriate stays than in appropriate stays. In a log regression model, the age, feeding care intensity, therapy care intensity and DRG assigned to each process were independent predictive factors of inappropriate stays. For application of AEP, 56.9% of cases were reviewed using PRN register forms and 43.1% were reviewed using the case history.
From the DRG examined, patients who undertook inappropriate stays consumed a large intensity of nursing basic activities; therefore, they may be candidates for receiving home care and/or sociosanitary care. PRN register forms afforded a decreased review time on applying the AEP.
确定不适当住院时间的比例、其类型以及诊断相关分组(DRG)中的护理水平。在确定适宜性评估方案(AEP)时,评估护理项目研究(PRN)登记表的使用情况。
对1997年2月至7月间医院中按10种最常见DRG之一分类的494例患者进行横断面研究。使用了患者临床病历、PRN登记表、社会人口统计学数据以及护理活动的信息。在出院前一天评估住院时间对AEP的适宜性。对不适当住院时间和适当住院时间进行比较,分类变量采用卡方检验,连续变量采用学生t检验。使用对数回归模型估计与住院时间不适当相关的独立因素。
在417例有效病例中,269例(64.5%)患者的住院时间被认为是适当的,148例(35.5%)患者的住院时间不适当。不适当住院时间患者的平均年龄显著高于适当住院时间患者(70.06±13.84对61.57±15.07,p<0.05)。不适当住院时间的护理强度大于适当住院时间(中位数137[最小值45,最大值355]对中位数95[最小值35,最大值131],p<0.001)。不适当住院时间患者在活动、排泄和卫生活动方面的护理时间比适当住院时间患者长。在对数回归模型中,年龄、喂养护理强度、治疗护理强度以及分配给每个过程的DRG是住院时间不适当的独立预测因素。对于AEP的应用,56.9%的病例使用PRN登记表进行审查,43.1%的病例使用病历进行审查。
在所检查的DRG中,住院时间不适当的患者消耗了大量的护理基本活动;因此,他们可能是接受家庭护理和/或社会卫生护理的对象。PRN登记表在应用AEP时减少了审查时间。