Morrison R R, Jones R, Byford A M, Stell A R, Peart J, Headrick J P, Matherne G P
Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Sep;279(3):H1071-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.3.H1071.
The role of A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)AR) in ischemic preconditioning was investigated in isolated crystalloid-perfused wild-type and transgenic mouse hearts with increased A(1)AR. The effect of preconditioning on postischemic myocardial function, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and infarct size was examined. Functional recovery was greater in transgenic versus wild-type hearts (44.8 +/- 3.4% baseline vs. 25.6 +/- 1.7%). Preconditioning improved functional recovery in wild-type hearts from 25.6 +/- 1.7% to 37.4 +/- 2.2% but did not change recovery in transgenic hearts (44.8 +/- 3.4% vs. 44.5 +/- 3.9%). In isovolumically contracting hearts, pretreatment with selective A(1) receptor antagonist 1, 3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine attenuated the improved functional recovery in both wild-type preconditioned (74.2 +/- 7.3% baseline rate of pressure development over time untreated vs. 29.7 +/- 7.3% treated) and transgenic hearts (84.1 +/- 12.8% untreated vs. 42.1 +/- 6.8% treated). Preconditioning wild-type hearts reduced LDH release (from 7,012 +/- 1,451 to 1,691 +/- 1,256 U. l(-1). g(-1). min(-1)) and infarct size (from 62.6 +/- 5.1% to 32.3 +/- 11.5%). Preconditioning did not affect LDH release or infarct size in hearts overexpressing A(1)AR. Compared with wild-type hearts, A(1)AR overexpression markedly reduced LDH release (from 7,012 +/- 1,451 to 917 +/- 1,123 U. l(-1). g(-1). min(-1)) and infarct size (from 62.6 +/- 5.1% to 6.5 +/- 2.1%). These data demonstrate that murine preconditioning involves endogenous activation of A(1)AR. The beneficial effects of preconditioning and A(1)AR overexpression are not additive. Taken with the observation that A(1)AR blockade equally eliminates the functional protection resulting from both preconditioning and transgenic A(1)AR overexpression, we conclude that the two interventions affect cardioprotection via common mechanisms or pathways.
在分离的晶体灌注野生型和A(1)腺苷受体(A(1)AR)增加的转基因小鼠心脏中,研究了A(1)AR在缺血预处理中的作用。检测了预处理对缺血后心肌功能、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)释放和梗死面积的影响。与野生型心脏相比,转基因心脏的功能恢复更好(分别为基线的44.8±3.4%和25.6±1.7%)。预处理使野生型心脏的功能恢复从25.6±1.7%提高到37.4±2.2%,但未改变转基因心脏的恢复情况(分别为44.8±3.4%和44.5±3.9%)。在等容收缩心脏中,用选择性A(1)受体拮抗剂1,3-二丙基-8-环戊基黄嘌呤预处理可减弱野生型预处理心脏(未处理时压力随时间发展的基线速率为74.2±7.3%,处理后为29.7±7.3%)和转基因心脏(未处理时为84.1±12.8%,处理后为42.1±6.8%)功能恢复的改善。预处理野生型心脏可减少LDH释放(从7,012±1,451降至1,691±1,256 U·l(-1)·g(-1)·min(-1))和梗死面积(从62.6±5.1%降至32.3±11.5%)。预处理对过表达A(1)AR的心脏的LDH释放或梗死面积无影响。与野生型心脏相比,A(1)AR过表达显著降低了LDH释放(从7,012±1,451降至917±1,123 U·l(-1)·g(-1)·min(-1))和梗死面积(从62.6±5.1%降至6.5±2.1%)。这些数据表明,小鼠预处理涉及A(1)AR的内源性激活。预处理和A(1)AR过表达的有益作用并非相加。鉴于A(1)AR阻断同样消除了预处理和转基因A(1)AR过表达所产生的功能保护作用,我们得出结论,这两种干预措施通过共同的机制或途径影响心脏保护。