Suppr超能文献

[赖脯胰岛素(B28位赖氨酸,B29位脯氨酸)治疗1型糖尿病青少年及青年患者]

[Insulin Lispro (Lys B28, Pro B29) treatment in adolescents and young people with type 1 diabetes].

作者信息

Tuset Castellano M J, Martínez Badás I, Alonso Blanco M, Barrio Castellanos R

机构信息

Unidad de Endocrinología Pediátrica, Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid.

出版信息

An Esp Pediatr. 2000 Apr;52(4):334-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The human insulin analogue, Lispro (Lys B28, Pro B29), is more similar to normal pancreatic insulin response to ingestion. Therefore, it could provide an alternative to the classical treatment of type-1 diabetes in childhood. The aim of this study was to analyze the response to insulin treatment with this analogue during 1 year.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a study group of twenty puberal diabetic patients (nine male and 11 female) with a mean age of 15.6 years (+/- SD) and with diabetes of a mean of 8.3 years (+/- 4.3 SD), classical intensive treatment, a combination of regular insulin (HR) and NPH insulin (Humulin NPH) was substituted for a new treatment with Lispro and NPH insulin in 3-4 doses. All patients had received diabetic education and performed at least four blood glucose tests daily and self monitoring. We analyzed the 6 months prior to the change in treatment (Group A) and the 12 months after the change (Group B). The amount of insulin (u/kg/day), the fast/intermediate insulin ratio in each dose, dietary modifications, the level of metabolic control given by the HbA1C average measured every 2 months, severe hypoglycemia and the patient s level of satisfaction with the new treatment were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The number of daily doses, as well as the daily insulin intake, was the same in both groups (3.7 [+/- 0.6] doses/day; 0.9 [+/- 0.2] u/kg/day). With Lispro treatment the ratio fast/intermediate insulin was reduced. This reduction was statistically significant for the pre-breakfast dose (Classical = 65. 4 +/- 30% vs Lispro = 47.1 +/- 19.6%), and for the pre-lunch dose (Classical = 58.1 +/- 29.3% vs Lispro = 39 +/- 12.8%). Most patients did not need neither mid-morning or mid-afternoon doses. There were no modifications in body mass index. Although metabolic control improved slightly (Classical X A(b) A(1)c = 7 +/- 1.2 vs Lispro X A(b) A(1c) = 6.6 +/- 1.1), the difference was not statistically significant. Three patients had a severe hypoglycemic episode in the first 6 months with the new treatment pattern. All of them were satisfied with the new insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive therapy with Lispro insulin combined with appropriate doses of basal insulin (NPH) can provide a good alternative in the treatment of diabetic teenagers.

摘要

背景

人胰岛素类似物赖脯胰岛素(赖氨酸B28,脯氨酸B29)更类似于正常胰腺对摄入物的胰岛素反应。因此,它可为儿童1型糖尿病的经典治疗提供一种替代方案。本研究的目的是分析该类似物胰岛素治疗1年期间的反应。

患者与方法

在一个研究组中,20名青春期糖尿病患者(9名男性和11名女性),平均年龄15.6岁(±标准差),糖尿病病程平均8.3年(±4.3标准差),将经典强化治疗,即正规胰岛素(HR)和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(优泌林NPH)联合治疗,替换为3 - 4次剂量的赖脯胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的新治疗方案。所有患者均接受了糖尿病教育,每天至少进行4次血糖检测和自我监测。我们分析了治疗改变前的6个月(A组)和改变后的12个月(B组)。比较了两组之间胰岛素用量(单位/千克/天)、各剂量中速效/中效胰岛素比例、饮食调整、每2个月测量的糖化血红蛋白平均值所反映的代谢控制水平、严重低血糖情况以及患者对新治疗的满意度。

结果

两组的每日剂量数以及每日胰岛素摄入量相同(3.7[±0.6]次/天;0.9[±0.2]单位/千克/天)。使用赖脯胰岛素治疗时,速效/中效胰岛素比例降低。早餐前剂量(经典治疗 = 65.4±30%,赖脯胰岛素 = 47.1±19.6%)和午餐前剂量(经典治疗 = 58.1±29.3%,赖脯胰岛素 = 39±12.8%)的这种降低具有统计学意义。大多数患者不需要上午或下午加餐时的胰岛素剂量。体重指数没有变化。尽管代谢控制略有改善(经典治疗组糖化血红蛋白 = 7±1.2,赖脯胰岛素组糖化血红蛋白 = 6.6±1.1),但差异无统计学意义。在新治疗方案的前6个月,有3名患者发生了严重低血糖事件。他们所有人都对新胰岛素感到满意。

结论

赖脯胰岛素强化治疗联合适当剂量的基础胰岛素(中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素)可为糖尿病青少年的治疗提供一个良好的替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验