Orthlieb J D, Laurent M, Laplanche O
UFR Odontologie, Université De La Méditerranée, Marseille, France.
J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Sep;27(9):802-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00592.x.
The literature does not establish a single proven method for determining lower facial height, which is called the Vertical Dimension of Occlusion (VDO), and the concept of a vertical comfort range is generally accepted. This study aimed to test the statistical significance of correlations of mandibular shape versus lower facial height in occlusion, using cephalometric measurements. Correlations for 505 consecutive healthy adults were calculated between angles that estimate the lower facial height and angles that estimate the mandibular shape. The mandibular angle (gonial) showed a higher coefficient of correlation (r = 0.691) than the inferior gonial angle. The dispersion remained large, i.e. r2 = 0.478. Cephalometric measurements, despite theirs imperfections, could help the practitioner to understand what the best course of treatment would be in order to obtain a lower facial height in occlusion showing a skeletal harmony with the mandibular shape.
文献中并未确立一种单一的、经证实的确定面下高度(即咬合垂直距离,VDO)的方法,垂直舒适范围的概念已被普遍接受。本研究旨在使用头影测量法,测试咬合状态下下颌骨形态与面下高度相关性的统计学意义。计算了505名连续健康成年人中,估计面下高度的角度与估计下颌骨形态的角度之间的相关性。下颌角(gonial角)的相关系数(r = 0.691)高于下颌下角度。离散度仍然很大,即r² = 0.478。尽管头影测量存在缺陷,但它可以帮助从业者了解,为了获得与下颌骨形态骨骼协调的咬合面下高度,最佳治疗方案是什么。