Allan A, Allan M M
School of Psychology, Edith Cowan University, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Perth, WA 6027, Australia.
Behav Sci Law. 2000;18(4):459-77. doi: 10.1002/1099-0798(2000)18:4<459::aid-bsl366>3.0.co;2-t.
A Truth Commission is one of the institutions used in international law to investigate gross human rights violations within a specific country. In this article we examine claims that the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was therapeutic. In the absence of empirical evidence, this examination will be guided by a theoretical framework that will reflect ways by which we believe international legal institutions can contribute tot he healing of the people of a country in which human rights abuses have taken place. We developed this framework with reference to the literature. Our conclusion is that the legislator's emphasis on truth, reconciliation, stability, and restorative justice enhanced the TRC's potential to promote healing, but that some features of this procedure and the enabling Act, the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act (1995), restricted its ability to be therapeutic. We conclude by looking at the role culture may have played in the success of the TRC.
真相与和解委员会是国际法中用于调查特定国家严重侵犯人权行为的机构之一。在本文中,我们探讨了有关南非真相与和解委员会具有治疗作用的说法。由于缺乏实证证据,此次探讨将以一个理论框架为指导,该框架将反映我们认为国际法律机构能够促进发生过侵犯人权行为的国家人民愈合的方式。我们参考相关文献制定了这个框架。我们的结论是,立法者对真相、和解、稳定及恢复性司法的强调增强了真相与和解委员会促进愈合的潜力,但该程序及授权法案《促进民族团结与和解法》(1995年)的一些特征限制了其发挥治疗作用的能力。我们通过审视文化在真相与和解委员会成功中可能发挥的作用来得出结论。