Bode A P, Hickerson D H
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Platelets. 2000 Aug;11(5):259-71. doi: 10.1080/09537100050129279.
The typical data presentation by flow cytometry of platelet suspensions stimulated with calcium ionophore A-23187, thrombin, C5b-9, or other agonists shows a unimodal decrease (or 'left-shift') in forward angle light scatter. Many reports in the literature interpret these findings as indicative of the appearance of small membranous microparticles generated from the platelets as part of the activation response. Investigators may attempt to quantify the microparticles by calculation of the percentage of counts falling below a gate set around the forward angle light scatter distribution of fresh, non-activated platelets. We believe that this approach can lead to erroneous results unless the total particle count in the sample is also determined. The true change in total particle count in a platelet sample is easily estimated on the flow cytometer by adding a known amount of fluorescent beads to the platelet suspension and noting a change in the ratio of bead versus non-bead event counts as a result of the stimulus added. Using this technique under settings considered routine for platelet analysis on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson), we have found that particle counts increased very little (less than a doubling) in platelet suspensions stimulated with 1-10 microM A-23187 or 0.01-0.5 U/ml thrombin or with sera from patients with diagnosed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Only by employing high sensitivity settings for signal thresholding on orthogonal light scatter, combined with fluorescence gating on high prevalence surface antigens, were we able to detect significant increases (5- or 6-fold) in total particle count in the same experiments. The new events we observed were separated by a decade or more (log scale) from intact platelets on the light scatter plots and fluorescence histograms in a bimodal distribution. We postulate that the unimodal-shifted population of events seen under routine settings after stimulation with ionophore is really degranulated platelets, and only the much smaller new modal subpopulation represents microparticles released as new entities into the platelet suspension. We conclude that without high sensitivity settings for data acquisition, it is most likely incorrect to claim that the left-shifted events on flow cytometry light scatter plots appearing contiguous with the distribution of activated platelets are released microparticles.
用钙离子载体A - 23187、凝血酶、C5b - 9或其他激动剂刺激血小板悬液后,流式细胞术呈现的典型数据显示前向角光散射呈单峰下降(或“左移”)。文献中的许多报道将这些发现解释为血小板激活反应过程中产生的小膜性微粒出现的迹象。研究人员可能会尝试通过计算落在围绕新鲜、未激活血小板前向角光散射分布设置的门限以下的计数百分比来量化微粒。我们认为,除非同时确定样品中的总颗粒计数,否则这种方法可能会导致错误的结果。通过向血小板悬液中加入已知量的荧光珠,并记录由于添加刺激物导致的珠与非珠事件计数比率的变化,很容易在流式细胞仪上估计血小板样品中总颗粒计数的真实变化。在Becton - Dickinson公司的FACScan流式细胞仪上使用被认为是血小板分析常规设置的条件下运用这项技术,我们发现在用1 - 10微摩尔/升的A - 23187或0.01 - 0.5单位/毫升的凝血酶刺激的血小板悬液中,或者在来自诊断为肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)患者的血清刺激下,颗粒计数增加很少(不到两倍)。只有通过对正交光散射采用高灵敏度的信号阈值设置,并结合对高表达表面抗原进行荧光门控,我们才能在相同实验中检测到总颗粒计数显著增加(5至6倍)。我们在光散射图和荧光直方图上观察到的新事件与完整血小板在双峰分布中相隔一个数量级或更多(对数尺度)。我们推测在用离子载体刺激后在常规设置下看到的单峰移位事件群体实际上是脱颗粒的血小板,只有小得多的新模态亚群才代表作为新实体释放到血小板悬液中的微粒。我们得出结论,在没有高灵敏度数据采集设置的情况下,声称流式细胞术光散射图上与激活血小板分布相邻的左移事件是释放的微粒很可能是不正确的。