Suppr超能文献

生活史理论中适合度的演变。

The evolution of fitness in life-history theory.

作者信息

Brommer J E

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Aug;75(3):377-404. doi: 10.1017/s000632310000551x.

Abstract

Theory concerning the evolution of life history (the schedule of reproduction and survival) focuses on describing the life history which maximises fitness. Although there is an intuitive link between life history and fitness, there are in fact several measures of the 'black box' concept of fitness. There has been a debate in the bio-mathematical literature on the predictive difference between the two most commonly used measures; intrinsic rate of increase r and net reproductive ratio R0. Although both measures aim to describe fitness, models using one of the measures may predict the opposite of similar models using the other measure, which is clearly undesirable. Here, I review the evolution of these fitness measures over the last four decades, the predictive differences between these measures and the resulting shift of the fitness concept. I focus in particular on some recent developments, which have solved the dilemma of predictive differences between these fitness measures by explicitly acknowledging the game-theoretical nature of life-history evolution.

摘要

关于生命史(繁殖与生存时间表)进化的理论着重于描述使适应性最大化的生命史。尽管生命史与适应性之间存在直观联系,但实际上适应性这个“黑匣子”概念有多种衡量方式。生物数学文献中曾就两种最常用衡量方式之间的预测差异展开过争论,即内禀增长率r和净繁殖率R0。尽管这两种衡量方式都旨在描述适应性,但使用其中一种衡量方式的模型可能会预测出与使用另一种衡量方式的类似模型相反的结果,这显然是不可取的。在此,我回顾了过去四十年来这些适应性衡量方式的演变、这些衡量方式之间的预测差异以及由此导致的适应性概念的转变。我尤其关注一些近期的进展,这些进展通过明确承认生命史进化的博弈论性质,解决了这些适应性衡量方式之间预测差异的困境。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验