Chammas M F, Nguyen T M, Li M A, Nuwayhid B S, Castro L C
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;183(4):853-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.109049.
Expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia is gaining widespread acceptance in clinical practice. The objective of our study was 2-fold-to determine the frequency of fetal deterioration with expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia and to evaluate whether the presence of intrauterine growth restriction on admission is associated with a shorter admission-to-delivery interval or more deliveries resulting from nonreassuring fetal status in comparison with pregnancies with preeclampsia but without intrauterine growth restriction.
This was an observational study of women with singleton pregnancies at <34 completed weeks' gestation who were admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of severe preeclampsia and managed expectantly. Fetal status on admission, admission-to-delivery interval, indication for delivery, and neonatal outcome were examined.
Forty-seven women were studied during a 3-year period (1996-1999). Gestational age at admission was 29.8 +/- 2.6 weeks. The mean admission-to-delivery interval for the entire group was 6.0 +/- 5.1 days; in 42.5% delivery was for fetal indications. In comparison with the absence of intrauterine growth restriction, the presence of intrauterine growth restriction at admission resulted in a significantly shorter admission-to-delivery interval (3.1 +/- 2.1 vs 6.6 +/- 6.1 days; P <.05). Most fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (85.7%) were delivered before 1 week. Although 57% of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction were delivered for fetal indications, versus 39% of fetuses without intrauterine growth restriction, these rates were not found to be significantly different. Neonatal outcomes, as reflected by Apgar scores, number of admissions to and duration of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, and neonatal mortality rates, were similar.
Pregnancies complicated by severe preterm preeclampsia and the presence of intrauterine growth restriction at admission may not benefit from expectant management beyond the 48 hours needed for betamethasone to act. Furthermore, all patients may benefit from close fetal monitoring before delivery because of the high rate of intervention for deteriorating fetal status.
对重度早发型子痫前期进行期待治疗在临床实践中已得到广泛认可。我们研究的目的有两个——确定重度早发型子痫前期期待治疗时胎儿状况恶化的频率,并评估与无宫内生长受限的子痫前期妊娠相比,入院时存在宫内生长受限是否与入院至分娩间隔时间缩短或因胎儿状况不佳导致的分娩次数增加有关。
这是一项对妊娠 <34 周、单胎妊娠、因重度子痫前期入院并接受期待治疗的女性进行的观察性研究。检查了入院时的胎儿状况、入院至分娩间隔时间、分娩指征及新生儿结局。
在 3 年期间(1996 - 1999 年)对 47 名女性进行了研究。入院时的孕周为 29.8 ± 2.6 周。整个组的平均入院至分娩间隔时间为 6.0 ± 5.1 天;42.5% 的分娩是因胎儿指征。与无宫内生长受限相比,入院时存在宫内生长受限导致入院至分娩间隔时间显著缩短(3.1 ± 2.1 天 vs 6.6 ± 6.1 天;P <.05)。大多数有宫内生长受限的胎儿(85.7%)在 1 周前分娩。尽管 57% 有宫内生长受限的胎儿因胎儿指征分娩,而无宫内生长受限的胎儿这一比例为 39%,但未发现这些比例有显著差异。以阿氏评分、新生儿重症监护病房的入院次数和住院时间以及新生儿死亡率反映的新生儿结局相似。
合并重度早发型子痫前期且入院时存在宫内生长受限的妊娠,在倍他米松起效所需的 48 小时之后进行期待治疗可能并无益处。此外,由于因胎儿状况恶化而进行干预的比例较高,所有患者在分娩前进行密切胎儿监测可能会受益。