Pozzoli M
Dipartimento di Cardiologia, Ospedale A. Manzoni, Lecco.
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2000 Oct;1(10):1326-33.
The management of patients with heart failure requires an accurate and non-invasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressures. This is essential in order to optimize unloading treatment, interpret equivocal symptoms, assess disease severity (and prognosis), and follow up the hemodynamic effect of long-term treatments. Since Doppler technique was implemented, several non-invasive methods to estimate left ventricular filling pressures were developed. Among these, a method based on the calculation of the left ventricular-atrial pressure gradient and its subtraction from systolic arterial blood pressure can be used in patients with significant mitral regurgitation and well-defined continuous wave Doppler signal of the regurgitant flow. Mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocities, as assessed by pulsed Doppler, are closely related to left atrial pressures, and several derived indices can be used to qualitatively estimate left ventricular filling pressures in patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction who are in sinus rhythm. Furthermore, the combination of these indices in multivariable equations can improve this relationship and allows for a quantitative estimation of filling pressures, even in patients with significant mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation. There are, however, several groups of patients with heart failure in whom pulsed Doppler of mitral and pulmonary venous flow provides limited hemodynamic information. These include those with a) sinus tachycardia and/or prolonged P-R interval; b) normal left ventricular systolic function (and "pure" diastolic heart failure); c) primarily abnormal left atrial dysfunction (such as patients who had undergone heart transplantation), and d) technically inadequate Doppler recordings of pulmonary venous flow. To assess left ventricular filling pressures in these patients, two new methods which combine pulsed Doppler mitral flow indices with load-independent indices of left ventricular relaxation (either early diastolic velocity of mitral annulus, as assessed by tissue Doppler, or propagation velocity of mitral inflow, as assessed by color M-mode) can be used.
心力衰竭患者的管理需要对左心室充盈压进行准确且无创的评估。这对于优化减负治疗、解读模糊不清的症状、评估疾病严重程度(及预后)以及跟踪长期治疗的血流动力学效果至关重要。自从实施多普勒技术以来,已开发出多种无创评估左心室充盈压的方法。其中,一种基于计算左心室 - 心房压力梯度并从收缩期动脉血压中减去该梯度的方法可用于有显著二尖瓣反流且反流血流连续波多普勒信号明确的患者。通过脉冲多普勒评估的二尖瓣和肺静脉血流速度与左心房压力密切相关,并且几个衍生指标可用于定性评估因左心室收缩功能障碍而处于窦性心律的心力衰竭患者的左心室充盈压。此外,这些指标在多变量方程中的组合可以改善这种关系,并允许对充盈压进行定量评估,即使是在有显著二尖瓣反流和心房颤动的患者中。然而,有几组心力衰竭患者,二尖瓣和肺静脉血流的脉冲多普勒提供的血流动力学信息有限。这些患者包括:a)窦性心动过速和/或P - R间期延长的患者;b)左心室收缩功能正常(以及“单纯”舒张性心力衰竭)的患者;c)主要存在左心房功能异常的患者(如接受过心脏移植的患者),以及d)肺静脉血流的多普勒记录在技术上不充分的患者。为了评估这些患者的左心室充盈压,可以使用两种新方法,即将脉冲多普勒二尖瓣血流指标与左心室舒张的负荷独立指标(通过组织多普勒评估的二尖瓣环舒张早期速度或通过彩色M型评估的二尖瓣流入传播速度)相结合。