Boriani G, Biffi M, Frabetti L, Maraschi M, Branzi A
Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Heart Lung. 2000 Nov-Dec;29(6):412-6. doi: 10.1067/mhl.2000.109388.
A 57-year-old man with primary dilated cardiomyopathy and obesity received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator because of recurrent, poorly tolerated ventricular tachycardia despite continuous treatment with amiodarone. When the device was implanted, assessment of the ability to defibrillate induced ventricular fibrillation showed high energy requirements, with a lack of conventional safety margin between energies effective at defibrillation testing and maximal device output. Treatment with oral amiodarone was withdrawn and substituted with oral sotalol. A repeat defibrillation test, performed 54 days after amiodarone withdrawal and during D,L -sotalol treatment, showed a reduction in defibrillation energy requirements. In view of this experience, replacement of amiodarone treatment with an alternate class III agent (D,L -sotalol or other agents, if available) can be considered as a possible option in case of high defibrillation threshold at the time of the implantation in a patient receiving continuous amiodarone treatment.
一名患有原发性扩张型心肌病和肥胖症的57岁男性,尽管持续使用胺碘酮治疗,但仍因反复发作且耐受性差的室性心动过速而接受了植入式心脏复律除颤器。植入该装置时,对诱发心室颤动的除颤能力评估显示能量需求很高,在除颤测试有效能量与设备最大输出之间缺乏传统的安全裕度。停用口服胺碘酮,换用口服索他洛尔。在停用胺碘酮54天后且在D,L-索他洛尔治疗期间进行的重复除颤测试显示除颤能量需求降低。鉴于这一经验,对于在持续接受胺碘酮治疗的患者植入时除颤阈值较高的情况,可考虑用另一种III类药物(D,L-索他洛尔或其他可用药物)替代胺碘酮治疗作为一种可能的选择。