Arvat E, Ceda G P, Di Vito L, Ramunni J, Gianotti L, Broglio F, Deghenghi R, Ghigo E
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Italy.
Pituitary. 1998 Apr;1(1):51-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1009970909015.
The mechanisms underlying the reduction in the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs in aging are still unclear. Aim of our study was to verify in man whether age-related impairment of the neurohormonal control of GH secretion and/or receptor alterations are involved in the reduced GH response to GHRPs in aging. To this goal, in 16 normal elderly subjects (E, 66-81 yr) and 12 young controls (Y, 24-28 yr) we studied the effects of 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 micrograms/kg i.v. Hexarelin (HEX), a synthetic hexapeptide, or GHRH, as well as the interaction among HEX (2.0 micrograms/kg), GHRH (2.0 micrograms/kg) and arginine (ARG, 0.5 gr/kg) on GH secretion. In Y the GH response to increasing doses of HEX (1.0 vs. 2.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg; AUC0;v-120 +/- SEM: 1728.4 +/- 406.4 vs. 2265.9 +/- 298.4 vs. 2934.3 +/- 482.2 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05 for 1.0 vs. 2.0 micrograms/kg) and GHRH (649.6 +/- 111.4 vs. 792.2 +/- 117.6 vs. 1402.6 +/- 363.0 micrograms/L/h) showed a progressive increase. Two micrograms/kg HEX and 1 microgram/kg GHRH were the maximal effective doses. Similarly, in E the GH response to increasing doses of HEX (336.7 +/- 50.0 vs. 742.8 +/- 157.9 vs. 1205.1 +/- 178.1 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05 for 1.0 vs. 2 micrograms/kg, p < 0.001 for 1.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg and p < 0.03 for 2.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg) and GHRH (183.8 +/- 27.3 vs. 260.9 +/- 17.3 vs. 356.1 +/- 46.3 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.005 for 1.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg and p < 0.05 for 2.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg) showed a progressive increase. In E the GH response to 3 micrograms/kg HEX or GHRH were clearly higher than those to 2 micrograms/kg. However, at each dose the GH responses to HEX or GHRH in E were lower (p < 0.05) than those in Y. In Y the GH response to HEX + GHRH was synergistical (4259.2 +/- 308.0 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05). ARG strikingly potentiated the GHRH-induced GH rise (2640.8 +/- 273.6 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.01) but not the HEX-induced one (2371.7 +/- 387.2 micrograms/L/h) as well as the synergistical effect of HEX and GHRH (4009.1 +/- 360.8 micrograms/L/h). In E the GH response to HEX and GHRH was still synergistical (1947.7 +/- 306.0 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05) but these responses were lower than those in young (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in E ARG restored the GH response to GHRH (1858.9 +/- 172.8 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.01) and even those to HEX (2069.5 +/- 528.7 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.01) and HEX + GHRH (4406.0 +/- 1079.2 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05). Our present results indicate that the impairment of GHRP and GHRH receptor activity may have a role in the reduction of the somatotrope responsiveness in aging. However, the age-related reduction in the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs seems mainly dependent on age-related variations in the neural control, i.e. concomitant GHRH hypoactivity and somatostatinergic hyperactivity.
生长激素释放肽(GHRPs)在衰老过程中促生长激素释放活性降低的潜在机制仍不清楚。我们研究的目的是在人体中验证,生长激素分泌的神经激素控制的年龄相关性损害和/或受体改变是否与衰老过程中对GHRPs的生长激素反应降低有关。为了实现这一目标,我们对16名正常老年受试者(E组,66 - 81岁)和12名年轻对照者(Y组,24 - 28岁)进行了研究,静脉注射1.0、2.0和3.0微克/千克的六肽生长激素释放肽(HEX)、一种合成六肽,或生长激素释放激素(GHRH),以及研究2.0微克/千克HEX、2.0微克/千克GHRH和精氨酸(ARG,0.5克/千克)之间对生长激素分泌的相互作用。在Y组中,随着HEX剂量增加(1.0微克/千克对2.0微克/千克对3.0微克/千克;AUC0;v - 120 ± SEM:1728.4 ± 406.4对2265.9 ± 298.4对2934.3 ± 482.2微克/升/小时,1.0微克/千克对2.0微克/千克时p < 0.05)和GHRH剂量增加(649.6 ± 111.4对792.2 ± 117.6对1402.6 ± 363.0微克/升/小时),生长激素反应呈逐渐增加。2微克/千克HEX和1微克/千克GHRH是最大有效剂量。同样,在E组中,随着HEX剂量增加(336.7 ± 50.0对742.8 ± 157.9对1205.1 ± 178.1微克/升/小时,1.0微克/千克对2微克/千克时p < 0.05,1.0微克/千克对3.0微克/千克时p < 0.001,2.0微克/千克对3.0微克/千克时p < 0.03)和GHRH剂量增加(183.8 ± 27.3对260.9 ± 17.3对356.1 ± 46.3微克/升/小时,1.0微克/千克对3.0微克/千克时p < 0.005,2.0微克/千克对3.0微克/千克时p < 0.05),生长激素反应呈逐渐增加。在E组中,对3微克/千克HEX或GHRH的生长激素反应明显高于对2微克/千克的反应。然而,在每个剂量下,E组中对HEX或GHRH的生长激素反应均低于Y组(p < 0.05)。在Y组中,对HEX + GHRH的生长激素反应具有协同作用(4259.2 ± 308.0微克/升/小时,p < 0.05)。ARG显著增强了GHRH诱导的生长激素升高(2640.8 ± 273.6微克/升/小时,p < 0.01),但未增强HEX诱导的生长激素升高(2371.7 ± 387.2微克/升/小时)以及HEX和GHRH的协同作用(4009.1 ± 360.8微克/升/小时)。在E组中,对HEX和GHRH的生长激素反应仍具有协同作用(1947.7 ± 306.0微克/升/小时,p < 0.05),但这些反应低于年轻组(p < 0.01)。另一方面,在E组中,ARG恢复了对GHRH的生长激素反应(1858.9 ± 172.8微克/升/小时,p < 0.01),甚至恢复了对HEX的生长激素反应(2069.5 ± 528.7微克/升/小时,p < 0.01)以及对HEX + GHRH的生长激素反应(4406.0 ± 1079.2微克/升/小时,p < 0.05)。我们目前的结果表明,GHRP和GHRH受体活性的损害可能在衰老过程中生长激素细胞反应性降低中起作用。然而,GHRPs促生长激素释放活性的年龄相关性降低似乎主要取决于神经控制的年龄相关性变化,即伴随的GHRH活性低下和生长抑素能活性亢进。