Patel R, Piper K E, Rouse M S, Steckelberg J M
Division of Clinical Microbiology and Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Dec;44(12):3438-40. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.12.3438-3440.2000.
The in vivo activity of linezolid or cefazolin against a clinical isolate of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (linezolid MIC, 2 microg/ml) was studied in a rat model of experimental osteomyelitis. Sixty rats with experimental S. aureus osteomyelitis were treated for 21 days with no antimicrobial, with 25 microg of linezolid per kg of body weight administered intraperitoneally twice or three times a day, or with 50 microg of cefazolin per kg administered intramuscularly three times a day. After treatment, the animals were sacrificed and the infected tibiae were processed for quantitative bacterial cultures. The results of treatment were expressed as log(10) CFU/gram of bone and analyzed by rank sum analysis. The results of linezolid treatment were not significantly different from those of untreated controls, while cefazolin treatment was significantly more active than no treatment or linezolid treatment.
在实验性骨髓炎大鼠模型中研究了利奈唑胺或头孢唑林对一株甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株(利奈唑胺 MIC 为 2 μg/ml)的体内活性。60 只患有实验性金黄色葡萄球菌骨髓炎的大鼠接受了 21 天的治疗,治疗方式分别为不使用抗菌药物、每天腹腔注射 2 次或 3 次每千克体重 25 μg 的利奈唑胺,或每天肌肉注射 3 次每千克体重 50 μg 的头孢唑林。治疗后,处死动物,对感染的胫骨进行定量细菌培养。治疗结果以每克骨组织的 log(10) CFU 表示,并通过秩和分析进行分析。利奈唑胺治疗的结果与未治疗的对照组无显著差异,而头孢唑林治疗的活性明显高于未治疗组或利奈唑胺治疗组。