Giusti M, Bertolotti G C, Nappi R E, Fignon A, Zara C
Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università degli Studi, Pavia.
Minerva Ginecol. 2000 Jun;52(6):221-7.
Breech presentation shows 3-4% incidence on every foetal presentation at the time of delivery and is more correlated than vertex presentation to a foetal risk of perinatal mortality (with a frequency from 2 to 5 times higher) and to foetal malformations, low weight at birth and prematurity. On the other hand, without a careful case selection, breech delivery has a higher risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality in comparison to cephalic presentation. It is estimated that perinatal mortality for breech presentation at term is about 4-5% for vaginal delivery and about 2-4% for caesarean section. In addition caesarean section has a higher maternal morbidity and a small but significant risk of perinatal mortality, therefore, external cephalic version (ECV) can be a good choice to increase physiological deliveries. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the real efficacy of this obstetric manoeuvre to decrease the frequency of breech presentation at delivery.
The study group included 67 patients (age 29.5 +/- 3.8) with foetal breech presentation at gestational age 35.8 +/- 1.9 weeks, recruited at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Pavia University. Every patient underwent ECV. The same physician has performed every ECV attempt using the forward roll technique, with previous tocolysis in 50 cases (rithodrine vs isoxsuprine). The following variables have been taken into consideration: amount of amniotic fluid, gestational age, kind of tocolysis, placental location, foetal back position, parity, breech variety and foetal adnexial complication at birth.
ECV succeeded in 77.6% (n = 52) and failed in 22.4% (n = 15) of cases. No maternal or foetal complications, side effects and spontaneous breech version occurred and in 74.6% of cases (n = 50) a vaginal delivery was performed. In 25.4% of cases (n = 17) a caesarean section was performed (15 breech presentation, 1 foetal distress in labour and 1 cervical dystocia). Among variables examined related to successful ECV, it has been observed that the amount of amniotic fluid (chi 2 = 15.33; p < 0.0000), the kind of tocolysis (chi 2 = 10.04; p < 0.007) and the umbilical cord rounds (chi 2 = 3.98; p < 0.045) were distributed in a significantly different way, whereas gestational age (p < 0.045) was significantly higher in unsuccessful ECV.
The results obtained suggest that ECV may be a good therapeutic approach for decreasing the percentage of breech presentation at delivery.
臀位分娩在每次分娩时的发生率为3% - 4%,与头位分娩相比,其与围产期死亡率的胎儿风险(频率高2至5倍)、胎儿畸形、低出生体重和早产的相关性更强。另一方面,若未进行仔细的病例选择,与头位分娩相比,臀位分娩的围产期发病率和死亡率更高。据估计,足月臀位分娩经阴道分娩的围产期死亡率约为4% - 5%,剖宫产的约为2% - 4%。此外,剖宫产的产妇发病率较高,且有小但显著的围产期死亡风险,因此,外倒转术(ECV)可能是增加自然分娩的一个不错选择。本研究的目的是评估这种产科操作在降低分娩时臀位发生率方面的实际效果。
研究组包括67例患者(年龄29.5±3.8岁),孕龄35.8±1.9周,胎儿为臀位,来自帕维亚大学妇产科。每位患者均接受了外倒转术。每次外倒转术尝试均由同一位医生使用向前滚动技术进行,50例患者术前使用了宫缩抑制剂(利托君与异克舒令)。考虑了以下变量:羊水量、孕龄、宫缩抑制剂类型、胎盘位置、胎儿背部位置、产次、臀位类型以及出生时胎儿附属物并发症。
外倒转术成功77.6%(n = 52),失败22.4%(n = 15)。未发生母体或胎儿并发症、副作用及自然臀位转位,74.6%(n = 50)的病例进行了阴道分娩。25.4%(n = 17)的病例进行了剖宫产(15例为臀位分娩,1例为产时胎儿窘迫,1例为宫颈难产)。在与成功的外倒转术相关的检查变量中,观察到羊水量(χ² = 15.33;p < 0.0000)、宫缩抑制剂类型(χ² = 10.04;p < 0.007)和脐带绕颈情况(χ² = 3.98;p < 0.045)的分布有显著差异,而失败的外倒转术组孕龄(p < 0.045)显著更高。
所获结果表明,外倒转术可能是降低分娩时臀位发生率的一种良好治疗方法。