Morioka C A, Abbey C K, Eckstein M, Close R A, Whiting J S, LeFree M
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.
Med Phys. 2000 Oct;27(10):2438-44. doi: 10.1118/1.1308280.
Clinical validation of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) algorithms is difficult due to the lack of a simple alternative method for accurately measuring in vivo vessel dimensions. We address this problem by embedding simulated coronary artery segments with known geometry in clinical angiograms. Our vessel model accounts for the profile of the vessel, x-ray attenuation in the original background, and noise in the imaging system. We have compared diameter measurements of our computer simulated arteries with measurements of an x-ray Telescopic-Shaped Phantom (XTSP) with the same diameters. The results show that for both uniform and anthropomorphic backgrounds there is good agreement in the measured diameters of XTSP compared to the simulated arteries (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.99). In addition, the difference in accuracy and precision of the true diameter measures compared to the XTSP and simulated artery diameters was small (mean absolute error across all diameters was < or = 0.11 mm +/- 0.09 mm).
由于缺乏一种简单的替代方法来准确测量体内血管尺寸,定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)算法的临床验证存在困难。我们通过将具有已知几何形状的模拟冠状动脉节段嵌入临床血管造影中来解决这个问题。我们的血管模型考虑了血管轮廓、原始背景中的X射线衰减以及成像系统中的噪声。我们将计算机模拟动脉的直径测量结果与具有相同直径的X射线伸缩形体模(XTSP)的测量结果进行了比较。结果表明,对于均匀背景和拟人化背景,与模拟动脉相比,XTSP测量的直径具有良好的一致性(皮尔逊相关系数为0.99)。此外,与XTSP和模拟动脉直径相比,真实直径测量的准确性和精密度差异很小(所有直径的平均绝对误差≤0.11 mm±0.09 mm)。