Yoshitomi Y, Kojima S, Yano M, Sugi T, Matsumoto Y, Kuramochi M
Division of Cardiology and the Department of Clinical Research, Tohsei National Hospital, Suntoh-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Am Heart J. 2000 Dec;140(6):E27. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.110934.
Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor attenuates ventricular enlargement, whether beta-blocker therapy induces regression of left ventricular remodeling is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of bisoprolol therapy with those of imidapril therapy on left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Sixty patients with AMI who underwent reperfusion therapy were randomly assigned to an imidapril group (20 patients), a bisoprolol group (20 patients), or a control group (20 patients). Administration was started within 24 hours. Left ventricular function on admission and 3 months and 1 year after AMI was investigated.
Baseline characteristics on admission were similar in the 3 groups except for sex distribution. Mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in the bisoprolol group were higher than those in the imidapril group 1 year after admission (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: 12 +/- 7 vs 8 +/- 2 mm Hg, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure: 17 +/- 8 vs 11 +/- 4 mm Hg, P <. 01). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (EDVI) increased in the bisoprolol group throughout the 1-year period (P <.01), whereas EDVI in the imidapril group decreased (P <.01). The increases in EDVI during 1 year in the bisoprolol group were greater than those of the other 2 groups (bisoprolol: 12 +/- 10, imidapril: -9 +/- 7, control: 4 +/- 11 mL/m2, P <.01).
Early treatment with bisoprolol in AMI cannot prevent left ventricular remodeling, whereas imidapril attenuates left ventricular dilation by decreasing preload.
尽管血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂可减轻心室扩大,但β受体阻滞剂治疗是否能诱导左心室重构逆转尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较比索洛尔治疗与咪达普利治疗对急性心肌梗死(AMI)后左心室重构的影响。
60例接受再灌注治疗的AMI患者被随机分为咪达普利组(20例)、比索洛尔组(20例)或对照组(20例)。在24小时内开始给药。研究AMI入院时、3个月和1年后的左心室功能。
除性别分布外,3组入院时的基线特征相似。入院1年后,比索洛尔组的平均肺毛细血管楔压和左心室舒张末期压力高于咪达普利组(肺毛细血管楔压:12±7 vs 8±2 mmHg,左心室舒张末期压力:17±8 vs 11±4 mmHg,P<.01)。比索洛尔组的左心室舒张末期容积指数(EDVI)在整个1年期间均增加(P<.01),而咪达普利组的EDVI则下降(P<.01)。比索洛尔组1年内EDVI的增加大于其他2组(比索洛尔:12±10,咪达普利:-9±7,对照组:4±11 mL/m2,P<.01)。
AMI患者早期使用比索洛尔不能预防左心室重构,而咪达普利可通过降低前负荷减轻左心室扩张。