Fletcher C V, Acosta E P, Cheng H, Haubrich R, Fischl M, Raasch R, Mills C, Hu X J, Katzenstein D, Remmel R P, Gulick R M
University of Minnesota, Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
AIDS. 2000 Nov 10;14(16):2495-501. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200011100-00011.
To evaluate the steady state concentrations of saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, delavirdine, and adefovir in six different three- and four-drug combination regimens.
Randomized, partially double-blinded, multicenter study in a population of indinavir-experienced subjects with virologic failure. The first seven subjects enrolled in each of the six treatment arms from 10 participating sites were entered into this pharmacokinetic evaluation.
Multicenter study of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG).
HIV-infected subjects.
A 12-hour pharmacokinetic study was conducted after 2 weeks of drug administration.
Area under the concentration-time curve with statistical comparisons to evaluate the effect of the second protease inhibitor and the effect of the non-protease inhibitors.
There was no difference in saquinavir concentrations according to whether the second protease inhibitor was ritonavir or nelfinavir. Saquinavir concentrations in the groups receiving the combination of delavirdine plus adefovir dipivoxil were reduced by approximately 50% compared with those receiving delavirdine. Delavirdine concentrations were reduced by approximately 50%, in the delavirdine plus adefovir dipivoxil arms compared with the delavirdine arms.
Saquinavir concentrations were significantly lower in the arms containing the combination of delavirdine and adefovir dipivoxil compared with the arms containing delavirdine. Delavirdine concentrations were significantly lower when coadministered with adefovir dipivoxil. These drug-drug interactions were not expected, the mechanism(s) is (are) not clear, and additional studies are warranted. This study illustrates the need to understand more fully the pharmacokinetic characteristics of complex combination antiretroviral regimens prior to use in patient management.
评估沙奎那韦、利托那韦、奈非那韦、地拉韦定和阿德福韦在六种不同的三药和四药联合治疗方案中的稳态浓度。
在有病毒学失败经历的茚地那韦治疗受试者群体中进行的随机、部分双盲、多中心研究。从10个参与研究地点招募到的六个治疗组中的每组前7名受试者进入该药代动力学评估。
艾滋病临床试验组(ACTG)的多中心研究。
HIV感染受试者。
给药2周后进行12小时药代动力学研究。
浓度-时间曲线下面积,通过统计学比较评估第二种蛋白酶抑制剂的作用以及非蛋白酶抑制剂的作用。
根据第二种蛋白酶抑制剂是利托那韦还是奈非那韦,沙奎那韦浓度无差异。与接受地拉韦定治疗的组相比,接受地拉韦定加阿德福韦酯联合治疗的组中沙奎那韦浓度降低了约50%。与地拉韦定组相比,地拉韦定加阿德福韦酯组中的地拉韦定浓度降低了约50%。
与含地拉韦定的治疗组相比,含地拉韦定和阿德福韦酯联合治疗组中的沙奎那韦浓度显著更低。与阿德福韦酯合用时,地拉韦定浓度显著更低。这些药物相互作用未在预期范围内,其机制尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。本研究表明,在用于患者管理之前,需要更全面地了解复杂的抗逆转录病毒联合治疗方案的药代动力学特征。