Meini S, Patacchini R, Lecci A, Quartara L, Maggi C A
Pharmacology Department, Menarini Ricerche S.p.A., via Rismondo 12 A, 50135, Florence, Italy.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2000 Dec 8;409(2):185-94. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00850-5.
We have compared the pharmacology of different antagonists, Icatibant (H-DArg-Arg-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Thi-Ser-DTic-Oic-Arg-OH), MEN 11270 (H-DArg-Arg-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Thi-c(Dab-DTic-Oic-Arg)c(7 gamma-10 alpha)), and FR173657 ((E)-3-(6-acetamido-3-pyridyl)-N-[N-[2, 4-dichloro-3-[(2-methyl-8-quinolinyl)oxymethyl]phenyl]-N-methyl aminocarbonylmethyl]acrylamide) at bradykinin B2 receptors expressed in the guinea-pig ileum by using bradykinin and the non-peptide FR190997 ((8-[2,6-dichloro-3-[N-[(E)-4-(N-methylcarbamoyl)cinnamidoacety l]-N -methylamino]benzyloxy]-2-methyl-4-(2-pyridylmethoxy)quinoline) as agonists. In organ bath experiments, Icatibant and FR173657 exerted a non-competitive antagonism (pKB 9.5 and 9.2, respectively) of the contractile response to bradykinin, whereas MEN 11270 showed competitive antagonism (pKB 8.3, slope -0.90). The profile of action and apparent affinities of the three antagonists did not change if contact time was prolonged. The inhibition by the three antagonists of the contractile response to bradykinin was differently reverted by washout (MEN 11270 <30 min, Icatibant <60 min, FR173657 >60 min). The non-peptide ligand FR190997 acted as partial agonist if applied cumulatively to the bath (pD2 8.06, Emax 43% of maximal contractility), but as a full agonist when a maximally effective concentration was added (Emax 83%). FR173657 produced non-competitive antagonism of the response to FR190997 with apparent affinity similar to that measured toward bradykinin. On the contrary, Icatibant and MEN 11270 (300 nM both) competitively antagonized the contractile activity exerted by FR190997 with lower apparent pA2 value (6.9 and 7.2, respectively). In radioligand binding experiments, MEN 11270 and Icatibant displaced the [3H]bradykinin binding with pKi of 10.2 and 10.5 (Hill slope not different from unity), respectively. The non-peptide ligands displaced the [3H]bradykinin binding with similar affinity, their pKi being 8.7 and 8.6 for FR173657 and FR190997, respectively (both Hill slopes <1). The present study indicates the difference in the antagonism type (competitive vs. non-competitive) by Icatibant, MEN 11270, and FR173657, as mainly ascribable to their different reversibility from the bradykinin B2 receptor, and affected by the kinetic of the response induced by the different agonists. Results are discussed in view of a different interaction of peptide and non-peptide agonist at the receptor.
我们使用缓激肽和非肽类激动剂FR190997((8-[2,6-二氯-3-[N-[(E)-4-(N-甲基氨基甲酰基)肉桂酰胺基乙酰基]-N-甲基氨基]苄氧基]-2-甲基-4-(2-吡啶甲氧基)喹啉),比较了不同拮抗剂依卡替班(H-DArg-Arg-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Thi-Ser-DTic-Oic-Arg-OH)、MEN 11270(H-DArg-Arg-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Thi-c(Dab-DTic-Oic-Arg)c(7γ-10α))和FR173657((E)-3-(6-乙酰氨基-3-吡啶基)-N-[N-[2,4-二氯-3-[(2-甲基-8-喹啉基)氧甲基]苯基]-N-甲基氨基羰基甲基]丙烯酰胺)对豚鼠回肠中表达的缓激肽B2受体的药理学作用。在器官浴实验中,依卡替班和FR173657对缓激肽的收缩反应表现出非竞争性拮抗作用(pKB分别为9.5和9.2),而MEN 11270表现出竞争性拮抗作用(pKB为8.3,斜率为-0.90)。如果延长接触时间,这三种拮抗剂的作用模式和表观亲和力不会改变。通过洗脱,这三种拮抗剂对缓激肽收缩反应的抑制作用恢复情况不同(MEN 11270<30分钟,依卡替班<60分钟,FR173657>60分钟)。非肽类配体FR190997如果累积加入浴中则表现为部分激动剂(pD2为8.06,Emax为最大收缩力的43%),但当加入最大有效浓度时则表现为完全激动剂(Emax为83%)。FR173657对FR190997反应产生非竞争性拮抗作用,其表观亲和力与对缓激肽的测量值相似。相反,依卡替班和MEN 11270(均为300 nM)竞争性拮抗FR190997产生的收缩活性,其表观pA2值较低(分别为6.9和7.2)。在放射性配体结合实验中,MEN 11270和依卡替班分别以pKi为10.2和10.5取代[3H]缓激肽结合(希尔斜率与1无差异)。非肽类配体以相似的亲和力取代[3H]缓激肽结合,FR173657和FR190997的pKi分别为8.7和8.6(两者希尔斜率<1)。本研究表明依卡替班、MEN 11270和FR173657在拮抗类型(竞争性与非竞争性)上存在差异,这主要归因于它们与缓激肽B2受体的不同可逆性,并受不同激动剂诱导反应动力学的影响。鉴于肽类和非肽类激动剂在受体上的不同相互作用对结果进行了讨论。