Health Devices. 2000 Nov;29(11):385-90, 392-404, 407-27.
Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are extremely versatile systems that facilitate the transfer of digital images and patient data throughout a healthcare enterprise. PACS are most commonly used in radiology departments to process images from diagnostic imaging modalities, such as digital radiography devices and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems. In this article, we evaluate three such systems from three of the largest PACS suppliers--the Agfa IMPAX, GE PathSpeed, and Siemens Sienet. The ultimate goal of any PACS is to improve workflow within the enterprise. Our testing focused on whether, and to what degree, the systems could meet this goal. We found that all three PACS are fairly complete and able to support image distribution and improve workflow compared with film-based processes. However, we did identify significant differences--along with some noteworthy limitations--with respect to system design and operation, external integration capabilities, and supplier support and professional services. We have ranked the systems for each of these factors to help healthcare facilities identify the system that will best meet their needs. Also in this Evaluation, we present an overview of the technology, a Glossary of PACS terminology (see page 400), selection guidance, and discussions of PACS-related topics, including data compression options, the role of the DICOM standard, and concerns about data security in many of today's systems.
图像存档与通信系统(PACS)是极为通用的系统,可促进数字图像和患者数据在整个医疗企业内的传输。PACS最常用于放射科,以处理来自诊断成像模态的图像,如数字射线摄影设备和磁共振成像(MRI)系统。在本文中,我们评估了来自三大PACS供应商的三个此类系统——爱克发IMPAX、通用电气PathSpeed和西门子Sienet。任何PACS的最终目标都是改善企业内的工作流程。我们的测试重点在于这些系统能否以及在何种程度上能够实现这一目标。我们发现,与基于胶片的流程相比,所有这三个PACS都相当完善,能够支持图像分发并改善工作流程。然而,我们确实发现了在系统设计与操作、外部集成能力以及供应商支持和专业服务方面存在显著差异,以及一些值得注意的局限性。我们针对这些因素对各个系统进行了排名,以帮助医疗机构确定最能满足其需求的系统。在本评估中,我们还概述了该技术、PACS术语表(见第400页)、选择指南,并讨论了与PACS相关的主题,包括数据压缩选项、DICOM标准的作用以及当今许多系统中对数据安全的担忧。