Moore G T, Willemain T R, Bonanno R, Clark W D, Martin A R, Mogielnicki R P
N Engl J Med. 1975 Apr 3;292(14):729-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197504032921406.
Television and telephone communications were randomly used to compare their effectiveness in allowing consultation between a hospital-based physician and remote nurse practitioners. Visits using television for consultation averaged 50 minutes as compared with 40 minutes for telephone. This difference was caused by longer work-ups before the consultation, longer delays after it was requested, and longer consultations, themselves, on television. However, television consultations resulted in significantly fewer immediate referrals of patients to hospital physicians: 6 plus or minus 1 as compared to 12 plus or minus 1 per cent (mean plus or minus S.E.M) OF ALL TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS (P SMALLER THAN 0.005). Although no overall difference in satisfaction was documented between the results of television and telephone consultations, participants preferred the former for medical decision making and cited it for allowing more social interaction than telephone. These findings suggest that television may have its greatest value in remote sites where the sense of isolation is great and the need to reduce long-distance referrals offsets the costs of the system.
随机使用电视和电话通信来比较它们在让医院医生与远程执业护士进行会诊方面的有效性。使用电视进行会诊的平均时长为50分钟,而电话会诊为40分钟。这种差异是由会诊前更长的检查、会诊请求发出后更长的延迟以及电视会诊本身更长的时间导致的。然而,电视会诊导致患者立即转诊给医院医生的比例显著更低:在所有电话会诊中,电视会诊的这一比例为6%±1%,而电话会诊为12%±1%(均值±标准误)(P小于0.005)。尽管电视会诊和电话会诊的结果在总体满意度上没有记录到差异,但参与者在医疗决策方面更喜欢前者,并指出它比电话会诊能带来更多的社交互动。这些发现表明,电视在偏远地区可能具有最大价值,在这些地区,孤立感很强,减少长途转诊的需求抵消了系统成本。