Frost R J, Otto C, Geiss H C, Schwandt P, Parhofer K G
Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jan 1;87(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01270-4.
Diabetic dyslipoproteinemia characterized by hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and often elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol with predominance of small, dense LDL is a strong risk factor for atherosclerosis. It is unclear whether fibrate or statin therapy is more effective in these patients. We compared atorvastatin (10 mg/day) with fenofibrate (200 mg/day), each for 6 weeks separated by a 6-week washout period in 13 patients (5 men and 8 women; mean age 60.0+/-6.8 years; body mass index 30.0+/-3.0 kg/m2) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c 7.3+/-1.1%) and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia (LDL cholesterol 164.0+/-37.8 mg/dl, triglycerides 259.7+/-107 mg/dl, HDL cholesterol 48.7+/-11.0 mg/dl) using a randomized, crossover design. Lipid profiles, LDL subfraction distribution, fasting plasma viscosity, red cell aggregation, and fibrinogen concentrations were determined before and after each drug. Atorvastatin decreased all LDL subfractions (LDL cholesterol, -29%; p <0.01) including small, dense LDL. Fenofibrate predominantly decreased triglyceride concentrations (triglycerides, -39%; p <0.005) and induced a shift in LDL subtype distribution from small, dense LDL (-31%) to intermediate-dense LDL (+36%). The concentration of small, dense LDL was comparable during therapy to both drugs (atorvastatin 62.8+/-19.5 mg/dl, fenofibrate 63.0+/-18.1 mg/dl). Both drugs induced an increase in HDL cholesterol (atorvastatin +10%, p <0.05; fenofibrate +11%, p = 0.06). In addition, fenofibrate decreased fibrinogen concentration (-15%, p <0.01) associated with a decrease in plasma viscosity by 3% (p <0.01) and improved red cell aggregation by 15% (p <0.05), whereas atorvastatin did not affect any hemorheologic parameter. We conclude that atorvastatin and fenofibrate can improve lipoprotein metabolism in type 2 diabetes. However, the medications affect different aspects of lipoprotein metabolism.
以高甘油三酯血症、低高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇为特征,且常伴有低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇升高及小而密LDL为主的糖尿病血脂蛋白异常是动脉粥样硬化的一个重要危险因素。目前尚不清楚贝特类药物或他汀类药物治疗对这些患者是否更有效。我们采用随机交叉设计,对13例2型糖尿病患者(5例男性,8例女性;平均年龄60.0±6.8岁;体重指数30.0±3.0kg/m²,糖化血红蛋白7.3±1.1%)和混合型高脂血症(LDL胆固醇164.0±37.8mg/dl,甘油三酯259.7±107mg/dl,HDL胆固醇48.7±11.0mg/dl)患者,分别给予阿托伐他汀(10mg/天)和非诺贝特(200mg/天)治疗,各治疗6周,中间有6周的洗脱期。在每种药物治疗前后测定血脂谱、LDL亚组分分布、空腹血浆黏度、红细胞聚集和纤维蛋白原浓度。阿托伐他汀降低了所有LDL亚组分(LDL胆固醇,-29%;p<0.01),包括小而密LDL。非诺贝特主要降低甘油三酯浓度(甘油三酯,-39%;p<0.005),并使LDL亚型分布从小而密LDL(-31%)向中密度LDL(+36%)转变。两种药物治疗期间小而密LDL的浓度相当(阿托伐他汀62.8±19.5mg/dl,非诺贝特63.0±18.1mg/dl)。两种药物均使HDL胆固醇升高(阿托伐他汀+10%,p<0.05;非诺贝特+11%,p=0.06)。此外,非诺贝特降低了纤维蛋白原浓度(-15%,p<0.01),使血浆黏度降低3%(p<0.01),红细胞聚集改善15%(p<0.05),而阿托伐他汀对任何血液流变学参数均无影响。我们得出结论,阿托伐他汀和非诺贝特均可改善2型糖尿病患者的脂蛋白代谢。然而,这两种药物对脂蛋白代谢的影响有所不同。