Belkoff S M, Mathis J M, Fenton D C, Scribner R M, Reiley M E, Talmadge K
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jan 15;26(2):151-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00008.
Ex vivo biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebral bodies.
To determine if the inflatable bone tamp (tamp) restores height to compressed vertebral bodies and to compare the biomechanical properties of isolated, fractured osteoporotic vertebral bodies treated by kyphoplasty (tamp) or vertebroplasty.
Previous biomechanical studies have shown that vertebroplasty increases vertebral body strength and restores vertebral body stiffness, but does not restore vertebral body height lost as a result of compression fracture.
Compression fractures were experimentally created in 16 osteoporotic VBs assigned to either the tamp or percutaneous vertebroplasty group. The tamp treatment consisted of inserting balloon-like devices into the vertebral body, inflating the bone tamp, and filling the void with Simplex P (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) bone cement. The percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment consisted of directly injecting Cranioplastic bone cement (CMW, Blackpool, UK) into the vertebral body. Pre- and posttreatment heights were measured, and the repaired vertebral bodies were recompressed to determine posttreatment strength and stiffness values.
The tamp treatment resulted in significant restoration (97%) of vertebral body height lost after compression, whereas percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment resulted in a significantly lower restoration of lost height (30%) (P < 0.05). Both treatments resulted in significantly stronger vertebral bodies relative to their initial state (P < 0.05). The tamp treatment restored vertebral body stiffness to initial values, but the percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment did not (P < 0.05).
Tamp treatment resulted in significantly greater height restoration than did percutaneous vertebroplasty, without loss of vertebral body strength or stiffness.
使用骨质疏松症尸体椎体进行体外生物力学研究。
确定可膨胀骨填充器(填充器)能否恢复压缩椎体的高度,并比较经椎体后凸成形术(填充器)或椎体成形术治疗的孤立性、骨折性骨质疏松症椎体的生物力学特性。
以往的生物力学研究表明,椎体成形术可增加椎体强度并恢复椎体刚度,但不能恢复因压缩性骨折而丢失的椎体高度。
在分配到填充器组或经皮椎体成形术组的16个骨质疏松症椎体中实验性制造压缩性骨折。填充器治疗包括将气球样装置插入椎体,使骨填充器膨胀,并用Simplex P(豪美德公司,新泽西州卢瑟福)骨水泥填充空隙。经皮椎体成形术治疗包括将颅骨成形骨水泥(CMW,英国布莱克浦)直接注入椎体。测量治疗前后的高度,并对修复后的椎体重新加压以确定治疗后的强度和刚度值。
填充器治疗使压缩后丢失的椎体高度得到显著恢复(97%),而经皮椎体成形术治疗使丢失高度的恢复率显著较低(30%)(P<0.05)。两种治疗均使椎体相对于其初始状态显著更强(P<0.05)。填充器治疗将椎体刚度恢复到初始值,但经皮椎体成形术治疗未恢复(P<0.05)。
与经皮椎体成形术相比,填充器治疗导致的高度恢复显著更大,且不损失椎体强度或刚度。