Suppr超能文献

心脏直视手术后使用更小、更灵活的胸腔引流管:初步评估

The use of smaller, more flexible chest drains following open heart surgery : an initial evaluation.

作者信息

Lancey R A, Gaca C, Vander Salm T J

机构信息

Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1):19-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1.19.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of smaller-caliber drains in patients undergoing open heart surgery.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of the medical records and chest radiographs assembled data on total amount of drainage, number of days of drainage, length of postoperative stay, appearance of postoperative chest radiographs, and need for further drainage from either the pleural or pericardial spaces.

SETTING

A large university-based teaching hospital, where > 800 open-heart procedures are performed yearly.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

A total of 202 patients underwent standard open heart surgery by one surgeon, and postoperative pleural and pericardial decompression was undertaken using small caliber, more flexible drains connected to bulb suction.

RESULTS

Tubes were left in an average of 2.4 days, with a mean of 826.7 mL collected during that time. The average postoperative length of stay was 6.7 days (median, 5 days). At or before 6-week follow-up, chest radiographs revealed moderate or large effusions in 19 patients (9.4%) in a pleural space that had been drained postoperatively. Twelve patients (5.9%) required an additional postoperative procedure for pleural drainage (eight thoracenteses, four tube thoracostomies). Four patients (2.0%) required reexploration of the pericardium for tamponade.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of smaller-caliber drains have been found at our institution to be an adequate means of decompression of the pleural and pericardial spaces following open heart surgery, with patients rarely having clinically significant pleural effusions at 6-week follow-up.

摘要

研究目的

评估在接受心脏直视手术的患者中使用较小口径引流管的安全性和有效性。

设计

对病历和胸部X光片进行回顾性分析,收集关于引流总量、引流天数、术后住院时间、术后胸部X光片表现以及是否需要对胸膜腔或心包腔进行进一步引流的数据。

地点

一家大型的以大学为基础的教学医院,每年进行超过800例心脏直视手术。

患者与干预措施

共有202例患者由一名外科医生进行标准的心脏直视手术,并使用连接球囊吸引器的较小口径、更灵活的引流管进行术后胸膜腔和心包腔减压。

结果

引流管平均留置2.4天,在此期间平均引流量为826.7毫升。术后平均住院时间为6.7天(中位数为5天)。在6周随访时或之前,胸部X光片显示,在术后已引流的胸膜腔中,有19例患者(9.4%)出现中量或大量胸腔积液。12例患者(5.9%)需要进行额外的术后胸膜腔引流手术(8例胸腔穿刺术,4例胸腔闭式引流术)。4例患者(2.0%)因心包填塞需要再次打开心包。

结论

在我们机构发现,使用较小口径引流管是心脏直视手术后胸膜腔和心包腔减压的一种适当方法,在6周随访时患者很少出现具有临床意义的胸腔积液。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验