Levine M N, Raskob G, Landefeld S, Kearon C
Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster Universirty, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1 Suppl):108S-121S. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.108s.
Bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The criteria for defining the severity of bleeding varied considerably between studies, accounting in part for the variation in the rates of bleeding reported. Since the last review, there have been several meta-analyses published on the rates of major bleeding in trials of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease. The major determinants of oral anticoagulant-induced bleeding are the intensity of the anticoagulant effect, underlying patient characteristics, and the length of therapy. There is good evidence that low-intensity oral anticoagulant therapy (targeted INR of 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0) is associated with a lower risk of bleeding than therapy targeted at a higher intensity. Lower-intensity regimens (INR < 2.0) are associated with an even smaller increase in major bleeding. In terms of treatment decision making for anticoagulant therapy, bleeding risk cannot be considered alone, ie, the potential decrease in thromboembolism must be balanced against the potential increased bleeding risk. The risk of bleeding associated with IV heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism is < 3% in recent trials. There is some evidence to suggest that this bleeding risk increases with the heparin dosage and age (> 70 years). LMW heparin is not associated with increased major bleeding compared with standard heparin in acute venous thromboembolism. Standard heparin and LMW heparin are not associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic coronary syndromes, but are associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic stroke.
出血是抗凝治疗的主要并发症。不同研究中定义出血严重程度的标准差异很大,这在一定程度上导致了所报告的出血发生率存在差异。自上次综述以来,已经发表了几项关于房颤和缺血性心脏病抗凝试验中严重出血发生率的荟萃分析。口服抗凝剂所致出血的主要决定因素包括抗凝效果的强度、患者的基础特征以及治疗时间。有充分证据表明,低强度口服抗凝治疗(目标国际标准化比值[INR]为2.5;范围为2.0至3.0)与高强度治疗相比,出血风险更低。更低强度的治疗方案(INR<2.0)与严重出血的增加幅度更小有关。在抗凝治疗的决策过程中,不能仅考虑出血风险,也就是说,必须在潜在的血栓栓塞风险降低与潜在的出血风险增加之间进行权衡。在近期试验中,急性静脉血栓栓塞患者使用静脉注射肝素的出血风险<3%。有一些证据表明,这种出血风险会随着肝素剂量和年龄(>70岁)的增加而升高。在急性静脉血栓栓塞中,与标准肝素相比,低分子量肝素不会增加严重出血的风险。标准肝素和低分子量肝素在缺血性冠状动脉综合征中不会增加严重出血的风险,但在缺血性卒中中会增加严重出血的风险。