Suppr超能文献

超声根尖预备对微裂纹形成及微渗漏的影响。

Effects of ultrasonic root-end preparation on microcrack formation and leakage.

作者信息

Rainwater A, Jeansonne B G, Sarkar N

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Louisiana State University Medical Center, School of Dentistry, Box 135, 1100 Florida Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 2000 Feb;26(2):72-5. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200002000-00003.

Abstract

Root-end preparations made with conventional ultrasonic (CUS) tips, diamond-coated ultrasonic (DUS) tips, and high-speed stainless-steel burs (HSB) were compared for the incidence of microcracks and dye leakage. One hundred twenty incisors were instrumented, obturated, and had 3 mm resected from their apices. Sixty teeth were used for microcrack evaluation before and after root-end preparation with CUS, DUS, or HSB. Three types of microcracks were observed: intracanal, extracanal, and communicating. Four of the five cracks observed after root resection (before root-end preparation) were of the extracanal or intracanal type. After root-end preparation, 19 of the 41 new microcracks that developed were the communicating type. There was no significant difference among CUS, DUS, or HSB for the number or type of cracks. Of the remaining 60 resected teeth, 25 were prepared with DUS, 25 with CUS, and 10 served as controls. All of the DUS and CUS teeth were filled with Super-EBA. Dye penetration was measured after immersion in Pelikan ink for 5 days. The dye penetration difference between DUS and CUS was not significant.

摘要

比较了使用传统超声(CUS)尖、金刚石涂层超声(DUS)尖和高速不锈钢车针(HSB)进行根尖预备时微裂纹的发生率和染料渗漏情况。对120颗切牙进行根管预备、充填,并从根尖切除3mm。60颗牙齿用于评估使用CUS、DUS或HSB进行根尖预备前后的微裂纹情况。观察到三种类型的微裂纹:根管内、根管外和连通性微裂纹。在根尖切除后(根尖预备前)观察到的5条裂纹中,有4条为根管外或根管内类型。根尖预备后,新出现的41条微裂纹中有19条为连通性类型。CUS、DUS或HSB在裂纹数量或类型上没有显著差异。在其余60颗切除的牙齿中,25颗用DUS进行预备,25颗用CUS进行预备,10颗作为对照。所有使用DUS和CUS预备的牙齿均用Super-EBA充填。将牙齿浸泡在百利金墨水中5天后测量染料渗透情况。DUS和CUS之间的染料渗透差异不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验