Iwano S, Ishigaki T, Shimamoto K, Inamura K, Maeda T, Ikeda M, Ishiguchi T, Kozuka T
Department of Radiology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan.
Eur Radiol. 2001;11(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s003300000522.
To clarify the diagnostic efficacy of color soft-copy computed radiographic (CR) images of the chest in the detection of subtle pulmonary abnormalities. Twenty observers compared 87 soft-copy CR images on four types of CRT monitor (nonmagnified monochromatic CRT, magnified monochromatic CRT, nonmagnified color CRT, and magnified color CRT). Of 87 test images, 45 (including two identical sets of 12 images to test intraobserver variability) were abnormal and 42 (including two identical sets of 12 images) were normal. Of the 45 abnormal images, 15 showed subtle abnormalities, 15 showed mild abnormalities, and 15 showed obvious abnormalities. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, there were no statistically significant differences among the four types of CRT display formats in the detection of subtle abnormalities. Color CRT monitors can replace monochromatic CRT monitors without any loss in the ability to detect subtle interstitial lung disease.
为阐明胸部彩色软拷贝计算机X线摄影(CR)图像在检测细微肺部异常方面的诊断效能。20名观察者比较了在四种类型阴极射线管(CRT)显示器(非放大单色CRT、放大单色CRT、非放大彩色CRT和放大彩色CRT)上的87幅软拷贝CR图像。在87幅测试图像中,45幅(包括两组相同的12幅图像以测试观察者内变异性)为异常图像,42幅(包括两组相同的12幅图像)为正常图像。在45幅异常图像中,15幅显示细微异常,15幅显示轻度异常,15幅显示明显异常。在接受者操作特征(ROC)分析中,在检测细微异常方面,四种类型的CRT显示格式之间无统计学显著差异。彩色CRT显示器可替代单色CRT显示器,在检测细微间质性肺病的能力上不会有任何损失。