Al-Dewani N, Hayes S J, Dummer P M
Department of Adult Dental Health, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000 Apr;16(2):75-83. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016002075.x.
The aim of this project was to evaluate and compare the radiographic quality and sealability of root fillings in extracted human teeth using lateral condensation of gutta-percha or the Trifecta obturating system. One hundred freshly extracted human mature, single-rooted teeth were divided into four identical groups of 25 teeth on the basis of root canal shape. The root canals of two groups were prepared in such a way as to produce a relatively parallel canal shape with little or no flare towards the coronal orifice. The root canals of the other two groups were prepared in such a way as to produce a canal shape that was deliberately more flared to ensure that they were wider at the orifice than at the endpoint of the preparation. All root canals were flushed with 17% EDTA solution and 2.5% NaOCl to remove the dentinal smear layer. The canals of one flared and one parallel group were obturated using cold lateral condensation and the canals of the other two groups were obturated using the Trifecta system. The sealability of each technique was assessed by a dye penetration method. The radiographic quality of obturation was determined for each canal using a 4-point scale. Canals filled with thermoplasticised gutta-percha had significantly less apical dye penetration than those obturated by lateral condensation (P < 0.001). Lateral condensation achieved significantly better scores for radiographic quality than thermoplasticised gutta-percha from both the bucco-lingual (P < 0.001) and the mesio-distal views (P < 0.001). Root canals obturated using the Trifecta technique showed significantly more apical extrusion of sealer than those obturated by lateral condensation (P < 0.001). Under laboratory conditions the Trifecta technique had better sealability but poorer radiographic quality than lateral condensation.
本项目旨在评估和比较在拔除的人牙中使用牙胶侧向加压充填法或Trifecta充填系统进行根管充填的影像学质量和封闭性。100颗新鲜拔除的人成熟单根牙根据根管形态分为四组,每组25颗牙。两组根管的预备方式是使根管形态相对平行,向冠方开口处几乎没有或仅有很小的喇叭口。另外两组根管的预备方式是使根管形态有意更呈喇叭口状,以确保其在开口处比预备终点处更宽。所有根管均用17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)溶液和2.5%次氯酸钠冲洗以去除牙本质玷污层。一组喇叭口状和一组平行状根管组采用冷侧向加压充填法进行充填,另外两组根管采用Trifecta系统进行充填。每种技术的封闭性通过染料渗透法进行评估。使用4分制对每个根管的充填影像学质量进行判定。热塑牙胶充填的根管根尖部染料渗透明显少于侧向加压充填的根管(P<0.001)。从颊舌向(P<0.001)和近远中向视图(P<0.001)来看,侧向加压充填法在影像学质量方面的得分明显高于热塑牙胶充填法。采用Trifecta技术充填的根管显示出比侧向加压充填法明显更多的封闭剂根尖部挤出(P<0.001)。在实验室条件下,Trifecta技术比侧向加压充填法具有更好的封闭性,但影像学质量较差。