Fischel J L, Rostagno P, Formento P, Dubreuil A, Etienne M C, Milano G
Oncopharmacology Unit, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice Cedex 2, France.
Br J Cancer. 2001 Feb;84(4):579-85. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1600.
A marked antitumour efficacy is currently obtained by oxaliplatin (LOHP)-fluorouracil (FU)-folinic acid (FA) combination and by CPT11-FU-FA combination. Logically, the triple association LOHP, CPT11 and FUFA will be soon tested in cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to compare two schedules combining SN38 (the active metabolite of CPT11, irinotecan) with FU-FA and LOHP. The two schedules differed by the SN38 position. The relative contribution of each drug in the resulting global cytotoxicity was evaluated. Two human colon cancer cell lines were used (WIDR and SW620 both p53 mutated). LOHP plus FA were applied for 2 h, just before a 48 h FU exposure. The SN38 sequence was applied for 24 h, starting either 48 h before LOHP-FA (schedule A), or just after LOHP-FA exposure (schedule B). Cytotoxicity was assessed by the 3-(4,5-demethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) test and drug interactions were analysed according to the Chou and Talalay method, based on the computation of a combination index (CI). The SN38 position significantly induces a shift from additivity-antagonism when SN38 was applied after LOHP, towards additivity-synergism when SN38 was applied first (P = 0.03). The relative contribution (RC) of each drug in the overall cytotoxicity of the triple combination was defined as the drug concentration giving 50% cell lethality (IC(50)) of the double association without that drug divided by the IC(50)of the triple association. Whatever the SN38 position, the larger contribution was made by LOHP (median RC = 2.4) and the smaller by SN38 (median RC = 1.1). In addition, the contribution of FUFA was improved when SN38 was applied first (median RC = 2.2) as compared to the opposite schedule (median RC = 1.2). Results were in agreement between the two explored cell lines. The present data should be taken into account when establishing the rationale of future trials combining CPT11, LOHP and FU-FA.
目前,奥沙利铂(LOHP)-氟尿嘧啶(FU)-亚叶酸(FA)联合用药以及伊立替康(CPT11)-FU-FA联合用药均显示出显著的抗肿瘤疗效。合理推测,LOHP、CPT11与FUFA的三联组合不久后将会在癌症患者中进行试验。本研究旨在比较两种将SN38(CPT11的活性代谢产物伊立替康)与FU-FA及LOHP联合应用的方案。这两种方案的区别在于SN38的应用顺序。评估了每种药物在整体细胞毒性中所起的相对作用。使用了两种人结肠癌细胞系(WIDR和SW620,二者p53均发生突变)。在进行48小时的FU暴露之前,先将LOHP加FA应用2小时。SN38的给药顺序为24小时,要么在LOHP-FA之前48小时开始(方案A),要么在LOHP-FA暴露之后立即开始(方案B)。通过3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)试验评估细胞毒性,并根据Chou和Talalay方法,基于联合指数(CI)的计算来分析药物相互作用。当SN38在LOHP之后应用时,SN38的顺序显著导致从相加-拮抗作用转变为当SN38首先应用时的相加-协同作用(P = 0.03)。每种药物在三联组合整体细胞毒性中的相对作用(RC)定义为在没有该药物的情况下,使双药联合产生50%细胞致死率(IC50)的药物浓度除以三联组合的IC50。无论SN38的顺序如何,LOHP的作用最大(中位RC = 2.4),SN38的作用最小(中位RC = 1.1)。此外,与相反顺序(中位RC = 1.2)相比,当首先应用SN38时,FUFA的作用有所增强(中位RC = 2.2)。在两种所研究的细胞系中结果一致。在确立未来联合应用CPT11、LOHP和FU-FA进行试验的理论依据时,应考虑本研究数据。