Brooks P M, Doherty R L, Donald K J
The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
Med J Aust. 2001 Jan 1;174(1):25-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143141.x.
Australia's present diverse and dynamic medical education environment has been shaped by: university funding increases by governments in the 1960s and 70s to promote Australia as a "clever" country; the Karmel Report's recommendations of increases in student numbers, new medical schools and a community focus for medical education; the successful innovations in entrance requirements and curricula of the most recent medical schools -Newcastle and Flinders; the formation of the Australian Medical Council, with a mandate to replace the British General Medical Council's accreditation of and restrictions on Australian medical school courses; the Doherty Report, which identified the close relationship between medical education, funding and workforce issues; the change to graduate entry and a four-year course for several Australian medical schools; and changing patterns of healthcare delivery, the imperative for increasing access to healthcare in rural areas, and the communication revolution made possible by information technology.
20世纪60年代和70年代政府增加大学资金投入,以推动澳大利亚成为一个“智慧”国家;卡梅尔报告提出增加学生人数、设立新医学院以及医学教育以社区为重点的建议;最新的医学院(纽卡斯尔和弗林德斯医学院)在入学要求和课程设置方面的成功创新;澳大利亚医学委员会的成立,其任务是取代英国普通医学委员会对澳大利亚医学院课程的认证和限制;多尔蒂报告,该报告指出了医学教育、资金和劳动力问题之间的密切关系;几所澳大利亚医学院改为研究生入学并采用四年制课程;以及医疗服务模式的变化、增加农村地区医疗服务可及性的迫切需求,还有信息技术带来的通信革命。